Homosexuality and the Abuse of Children’s Rights

Following the astonishing marriage between two Kenyan men in London on the 17th October 2009, I felt compelled to publish a cutting commentary I posted last year in my previous blog which google refused to tolerate in the interest of fair and open debate of the homosexual lifestyle. This post, which attracted angry rejoinders and attacks from homosexuals received a record 126 comments. It was probably the one reason Google decided to shut me down. Nonetheless, in light of recent developments among Kenyan homosexuals in London, I hereby share the post in the public interest.

=========================================

Children across the world are regarded as the most vulnerable and precious members of any society. They are not only a source of joy in many families, they are also universally regarded as a special heritage and blessing to our future as human beings.

Because of these reasons, any threats or risks to their wellbeing is never taken lightly or underestimated by any civilized society. An overwhelming number of people will go to great lengths to protect children and ensure no harm comes their way. Whenever their healthy growth is severely compromised, most people recognize that the consequences are very grave for society as a whole.

Indeed, this is the very reason that children’s rights are recognized and protected in the laws of virtually all functioning States in the world. You might be wondering at this point what the sordid homosexual lifestyle has to do with children’s rights, and what am driving at.

I intend to demonstrate here that the current trend in a number of Western countries, to support the so-called homosexual “rights” to marriage and subsequent “rights” to adopt children is a grievous transgression on the human rights of these children.

By placing children into homes that celebrate these unnatural unions, Western governments are foolishly and recklessly exposing thousands of innocent children to severe psychological trauma. This does not auger well for their healthy development as human beings.

To pretend that ‘two daddys’ or ‘two mummys’ can suitably play the role of parents to an innocent child is extremely cruel, myopic and astonishingly foolish. Only a sick mind would argue that the Western tragedy of “gay” parenthood — intentionally (and selfishly) placing helpless children in homes that are motherless or fatherless by design — is “equal” to natural, mom-and-dad parenthood and should be treated as such in the law.

Common knowledge and psychological research in the area of childhood development has numerously shown that children tend to be greatly influenced by their parents. By the simple reason of having been brought into the world through the union of a man and a woman, children nurtured appropriately by a loving father and mother often grow psychologically healthy and comfortable in their identities as boys or girls.

From an early age, boys subconsciously pick up male gender behaviour from their fathers while girls learn about their femininity from their mothers. A family set-up that deliberately replaces one of these parents with one from the same gender inevitably creates a gender identity crisis for a growing child.

With parents being the closest and primary role models for their children, it’s obvious that the homosexual game plan in these adoptions is to recruit innocent children into their lifestyle. Think about it: When a child is constantly exposed to two adults of the same gender hugging and kissing each other, people who the child believe to be the role models, protectors and guardians in their life, what is he or she likely to grow up thinking? 

It’s obvious that a child raised in this environment will view homosexuality as a perfectly normal lifestyle to aspire for in adulthood. The journey ahead for such kids is inevitably filled with so much needless pain, as I will now illustrate.

Potential sexual abuse of children

Children in these abhorrent homes are also potentially at high risk of sexual abuse from their disordered ‘parents’. As several credible researchers have found out, this is no idle talk. 

Citing a study (Freund & Watson, 1992), which was reported in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, NARTH found that homosexual males were “three times more likely than straight men to engage in adult-child sexual relations.” 

In addition, Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover says in his book Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, that there is a “substantial, influential, and growing segment of the homosexual community thatneither hides nor condemns pedophilia.” The North American Men/Boy Lovers Association (NAMBLA) is a good example. There is also a lesbian version going by the name “Butterfly Kisses”.

For these homosexuals, same-sex attraction to minors may originate from their own sexual experiences. Research shows that very often, homosexuals had their own initial same-sex encounter with an adult while children. 

Writing in a May 1992 publication of The Advocate, a faggot known as Carl Maves agreed. “How many gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable, liberating experience – one that initiated them into their sexuality – if it weren’t for this so-called molestation?” he said. The Advocate (established in 1967) is the oldest continuing homosexual magazine in the United States.

A review on a research conducted on the molestation of boys (Holmes and Slap, 1998), was published in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). It showed that adolescent boys who were abused by men were up to 7 times more likely to identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual later in life.

Western governments stand accused

In recent times, homosexual allies in Western governments (such as the radically pro-homosexual President Obama) are hell-bent on placing thousands of innocent children into the hands of homosexual couples (and potential pedophiles) in the name of “equality” in child adoptions. Many people would rightly view this as a fate worse than death.

Clearly, the natural and inalienable rights of these children, to be nurtured and raised lovingly by a mother and father have been grossly abused to satisfy the detestable whims and perverse fantasies of two disordered individuals.

Homosexuals and their equally misguided “liberal” supporters in the West love talking about “choice”. What damn bloody “choice” do they give these innocent angels when they place them in these disordered family set-ups?

I confidently submit that given a choice, no child on this earth would prefer to be raised by a ‘dad and dad’ or even a ‘mummy and mummy’ couple. This parody of the man-woman family structure can never nurture psychologically and morally balanced children. 

More often than not, these kids will have to endure years of severe traumatizing mockery from their peers, struggling to reconcile and understand why they do not have a real father and mother. And these are just the lucky ones. Others are likely to undergo sexual abuse from their “fathers”, as part of a sick “liberating” sexual lesson in growing up into homosexuality.

A right thinking society should put the welfare of children first by favoring natural parenting (mom and dad) over an experimental version (dad and male lover) that models perversion to innocent children in their own home. Thankfully, the 2001 Childrens Act in Kenya recognizes this under section 158. The section (without exceptions) disqualifies homosexuals from adopting children.

European Nations that currently allow this travesty to flourish, such as the United Kingdom, Sweden and the Netherlands, should closely examine themselves before pointing at Africa as a backward continent. Fellow Africans (with the exception of South Africa), if this is what Western progress, enlightenment and development is all about, let us happily remain in the dark ages with our total rejection of homosexuality in our countries.

For detailed and very useful information on how children develop into homosexuals, click on this link.

Homosexual Diseases Part 3: Mental Disorders

The question of whether homosexuality should continue to be regarded as a mental illness remains one of the most divisive debates to have ever engaged the American Psychiatric Association (APA) back in the 1960s and 70s. In 1970, the APA affirmed strongly that homosexuality was indeed a mental disorder. This decision lasted only three years before the association caved in to political intimidation and coercion.

In a press release dated December 15, 1973, the APA became the first medical organisation “to officially remove the stigma of disease from persons with same-sex preference”. It’s very important to note that no new medical findings had been made about homosexuality between 1970 and 1973 to reverse the diagnosis that it was a disease.  

The homosexual lobby brought about this reversal by its persistent and for the most part, dishonest public campaigning. This included coercion and lobbying of government and influential organizations in America. 

Numerous incidences are well documented during this period when homo activists frequently disrupted medical conferences, shouting down speakers and physically intimidating scientists. Clearly, the 1973 reversal was a political and not a scientific decision by the APA.

Its very easy to understand why the homosexual activists resorted to these unscientific tactics. The credibility of the homosexual movement was at great risk as long as the medical professional listed their behaviour as a sickness. Public opinion in America (and elsewhere) could be greatly influenced to regard homosexuality positively if a “scientific opinion” was to lend support to the homosexual cause. Thus, the 1973 APA decision opened the most important door for homosexuality to find a legal footing in western countries.

I will now demonstrate here that homosexuality remains a mental disorder, despite what misguided Western nations may want Africans to believe. Any honest, unbiased person who has studied the medical literature relating to homosexuality will surely reach the same conclusion.

Indicative research into homosexual mental disorders

Two extensive studies appearing in the October 1999 issue of the American Medical Association’s Archives of General Psychiatry confirm a strong link between homosexual sex and suicide, as well as a relationship between homosexuality and emotional mental problems.

One of the studies in the journal, by David M. Ferguson and his team, found that, “gay, lesbian and bisexual young people are at increased risk of psychiatric disorder and suicidal behaviors.”

These homosexual and “gay” youth were four times as likely as their normal peers to suffer from major depression, almost three times as likely to suffer from generalized anxiety disorder, nearlyfour times as likely to experience conduct disorder, five times as likely to have nicotine dependence, six times as likely to suffer from multiple disorders, and over six times as likely to have attempted suicide.

An extensive study in the Netherlands makes a mockery of the assumption that ‘homophobia’ is the cause of increased psychiatric illness among gays and lesbians. Of all the Western nations, the Dutch people are the most supportive of same-sex relationships. In fact, the Netherlands was the first country in the world to fully legalise gay marriages back in September 2000.

This obviously tells us that oppression of faggots in the Netherlands hardly arises and yet their anal practitioners suffer psychological distress similar to other faggots in western nations. The Dutch study, published in the January 2001 Archives of General Psychiatry, did indeed find a high rate of psychiatric disease associated with same-sex behaviors.

Compared to controls who had no homosexual experience in the 12 months prior to the interview, males who had any homosexual contact within that time period were much more likely to experience major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia and obsessive compulsive disorder.

Interesting Lesbian insights

Females with any homosexual contact within the previous 12 months were more often diagnosed with major depression, social phobia or alcohol dependence. In fact, those with a history of homosexual contact had higher prevalence of nearly all the psychiatric disorders measured in the study. One study in America noted over 300% increases in incidence of serious personal distress among lesbians as compared to heterosexual women.

There’s actually a simple explanation why lesbians experience alarmingly higher depression than their heterosexual counterparts. As any normal man or woman will tell you, women by nature invest more time, emotions and their self-worth into relationships compared to men. This is what you could call quality-of-relationship issues.  

Women therefore often put greater demands on the quality of the relationship in order to satisfy their own individual needs. This in turn puts higher stress on the relationship. Now put two women together in a lesbian relationship, each making the same high demands and one will predictably get a relatively short union leading to serious depression.

As Prof. Rob Gagnon, one of the world’s leading authorities on homosexuality eloquently explains,“Putting two (or more) people of the same sex in a sexual union does absolutely nothing for moderating the extremes of a given sex or filling in the gaps of a given sex. It rather magnifies the extremes and highlights the gaps. That is the nature of a one-sex sexual bond. This measurable reality discloses the non-measurable problem of attempting sexual merger with someone who is not a true sexual complement.”

===============================

In concluding this series on diseases related to the homosexual lifestyle, I would like fellow Kenyans to ponder the numerous lies promoted by the homosexual movement and their misguided agents in Kenya. 

At a time when even smoking is considered a serious danger to public health with smokers increasingly isolated in Nairobi, a lifestyle linked to a raging epidemic of disease and death is now being promoted to Kenyans as a “human right” that deserves to be celebrated. 

This blog has comprehensively demonstrated the fallacy behind this notion. Faggot apologists have a lot of work to do in showing Kenyans the ‘gayness’ (happiness) if any that exists in the homosexual lifestyle. What we’ve seen has been the very opposite.

Homosexual Diseases Part 2: Anal Cancer

No other part of the human anatomy defines homosexuality as much as the anus does. For faggots, this is the part they prefer to view as their “second” sexual genitalia rather than its rightful and natural function as an alimentary conduit for human excreta, otherwise known as SHIT.

Amazing as this sounds, they are actually fighting hard through subtle and sophisticated means for their behaviour to be acknowledged as a human “right” here in Kenya. Their morbid fascination with the asshole as an object of sexual desire defies logic or any rational understanding.

Most normal folks are so flabbergasted by this behaviour that they don’t know where to start in confronting the abnormality. It’s no wonder that many have resorted to religious arguments in rejecting homosexuality in their societies. You can clearly see this in the laudable stand the Anglican Church has taken in Kenya against homosexuality.

Nonetheless, this blog continues to tackle this sordid subject rationally, drawing on scientific facts rather than religious arguments to fervently reject this unnatural, deviant form of human sexual perversion.

In my endeavors to illustrate just how sick the homosexual lifestyle really is to human beings, I now share a few facts regarding a disease that afflicts faggots across the world. You’ll hardly hear of it being treated at the Nairobi Hospice, but anal cancer is found overwhelmingly among homosexuals as opposed to straight people in any given country.

Anal cancer is a rare, often curable cancer that produces slow-growing tumors and lesions in the anus and nearby anal anatomy. Most anal cancers are associated with Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), which causes warts on the anus and genitals, similar to cervical and other cancers of the reproductive system.

Anal cancer affects men and women, but it is the only cancer with a greater prevalence among men who have sex with men (MSM) than in the general population. About 35 in every 100,000 MSM develop anal cancer, compared to less than one in every 100,000 heterosexual men. This means that a faggot is at least 35 times more likely to develop the cancer compared to a straight man!

It gets even worse when you introduce HIV into the equation. The risk for anal cancer in HIV-positive men is twice as high as that for HIV-negative MSM. Source – LGBT Health Channel.

According to the United States Surgeon-general nominee Dr. James W. Holsinger, anal warts are commonly found among individuals who practice anal intercourse and only rarely found among heterosexuals practicing vaginal intercourse. “In one series of 260 homosexual men seen by proctologists, 134 (51.5 percent) had anal warts. They may occur anywhere in the anal-genital area but are particularly common in the anus of homosexual men. This infection appears to be correlated with the higher incidence of anal cancer in homosexual men”- Quoted from his 1991 paper on the patho-physiology of male homosexuality.

There are two other skin cancers that appear to have a high affinity for homosexuals. According to research results published in the American Journal of Epidemiology (Vol. 157, No. 11: 966-972),Kaporsis Sarcoma was more than 100 times more common in gay men, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was 15 times more common. Both cancers are known to be linked to HIV/AIDS. (About 10% of the men in the study had been diagnosed with AIDS.)

Kenyans need to reflect very deeply on these facts before they foolishly ape the west in adopting an evidently risky and dangerous sexual lifestyle. Clearly, a strong and unequivocal NO is the only answer we should continue to give to those among us who are under some fantasy that the law should be revised to decriminalize homosexuality.

==================================

There’s a predictable argument that is sure to follow this post regarding the question of anal sex among straight couples. In a naïve attempt to justify anal sex, many faggots and their sympathizers love retorting that it is also practiced by a growing number of heterosexual couples. I realize that there are a few people right here in Nairobi who might be under the illusion that anal sex adds spice and some form of kinkiness into their sex lives. People are sometimes allowed their delusions.

However, this is a practice that is clearly borrowed from the gay affirming western culture and not a homegrown sexual practice among Africans. I’m highly skeptical about its pleasure value but I’m 100% convinced of its severe health risk to its practitioners.

I submit that a man who claims to be straight would never ask for a woman’s asshole when the vagina is readily available, unless of course he is a closet faggot.

Part 3: Mental disorders

To be continued next post….

Diseases Associated With Homosexuality

Almost a year ago, on Sunday 8th June 2008 to be precise, I commenced a 3-part series of Posts focused on Diseases that are often and increasingly associated with Homosexual behaviour. The responses were overwhelming, especially from homosexuals who got deeply offended by the Truth regarding their dangerous lifestyle. Since Google (an increasingly pro-homosexual organisation) will not let bloggers such as myself debate openly against the Western Homosexual culture, I hereby share Part 1 of the Posts as a public record for fellow Kenyans. 

Part 1: HIV/AIDS
As we continue to demolish the flimsy foundations on which faggots base their claims to normality, today I commence a new chapter in which we’ll examine the severe threat homosexual behavior poses to both personal and public health. 

Over the last two decades, medical findings have strongly established that homosexual behaviour does indeed carry fundamental health risks not only to its practitioners, but also to the general public. In the United States of America for example, medical data has identified homosexual activity among males as by far, the largest single source of HIV infection in the general population.

In a dramatic admission early this year, homosexual activist Matt Foreman, executive director of the United States National Gay and Lesbian Task Force shocked fellow faggots by declaring, “HIV is a gay disease.”

While addressing the National Conference on Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender Equality in Detroit, Michigan, Foremen stunned the assembled faggots by stating, “with 70 percent of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi-sexual, we cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that.” The conference had the theme ”Creating Change”. 
 

Matt Foreman, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force executive director who admitted, “HIV is a gay disease.”

For many years, homosexual activists in the West have strongly and typically fought back whenever medical findings showed their lifestyle to be associated with the AIDS pandemic. The startling admission by one of their most prominent leaders in early February 2008 to this effect has left homosexual activists in a serious predicament.

Following this admission, gay activists will find it very difficult to promote and defend their behaviour in Kenya. As I will illustrate here, homosexuality is not only medically associated with life threatening diseases such as AIDS, but also with certain types of mental illness, substance abuse, eating disorders, cancer, hepatitis and premature death by up to twenty years.

Before I delve into these diseases, it’s important to note here that a United States Government agency, the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) has since 1992 maintained a policy of rejecting blood donated by Men who have had Sex with other Men (MSM), at any time since 1977 (the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in the United States). 

This is because MSM are as a group, at increased risk of HIV, Hepatitis B and certain other infections that can be transmitted by transfusion. According to the American Red Cross, MSM since 1977 have an HIV prevalence (the total number of cases of a disease that are present in a population at a specific point in time) 60 times higher than the general population, 800 times higher than first time straight blood donors and 8000 times higher than repeat blood donors. 

In addition, HIV surveillance data collected by the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through June 2000 suggests that nearly half of all HIV-positive teenage males are infected through sex with men. Through 2004, of all cases of HIV infection in the United States reported to CDC, 34% were attributed to male-male sexual contact, 14% to injection-drug use, and 20% to heterosexual contact. 

Through blood donor testing, homosexuals account for the largest single group of blood donors who have been found HIV positive. (Source – CDC website).

The FDA policy is not unique to the United States. Many European countries have recently re-examined both the science and ethics of the lifetime MSM deferral, and have retained it. Lifetime MSM deferral simply means that a man who has ever had sex with another man will never be accepted as a blood donor. This decision is also consistent with the prevailing interpretation of the European Union Directive 2004/33/EC article 2.1 on donor deferrals.

For more reasons on why this policy has remained in place despite the presence of many influential homosexual organisations in the USA, visit the FDA website link.

Here in Kenya, the prevalence of HIV/AIDS among Homosexuals is not any different from the sorry figures shared above. The General Manager of the Kenyan faggot website www.galck.org is on record admitting the same. He notes that “the few studies done on MSM activity in the country point at very grave seroprevalence levels among the MSM, typically a group that would also include gay men in Kenya. The Kilifi study points at 43%.” 

He candidly goes further to share: “Latest data from National Aids Control Council points out that 15% of all new HIV infections in the country are MSM related. For a population that is typically very small (perhaps less than 5%), these figures should be worrisome.”

With so many facts available in the public domain detailing the health dangers associated with homosexual behaviour, it would certainly be the height of foolishness and utmost recklessness for the Kenyan Government to EVER consider decriminalizing homosexuality in our country. 

Part 2: Anal Cancer

To be continued next post….

Words used by Homosexuals and what they really mean

Published on Monday, April 7, 2008 on Googles’ blogspot, the contents of this post attracted 66 comments. I rightly realised then that it was critically important for Kenyans to understand the language homosexual advocates frequently employ to further and even obfuscate their nefarious and nauseous lifestyle.

Without further ado, here’s the post in its entirety.
==================================== 

The homosexual movement has over the years perfected the use of words that are frequently employed with devastating effect to silence people who do not agree with their lifestyle. The propaganda value of these catch phrases has helped spread the homosexual ideology far and wide. Local converts of the lifestyle are now being tutored on how to employ the same words to defend themselves. As Kenyans who are awake to the homosexual agenda for our dear country, it’s only prudent that we list these words in order to understand how they have been used to obscure the fallacy of the sordid homosexual behaviour.

1. Gay – In tracing the propagation of the homosexual agenda, a significant development hardly ever examined, was the theft and ultimate corruption of the word “Gay”. In its original English usage, it meant a light-hearted and carefree person. However, in modern times you would be foolish to use this word in describing your cheerful and easy-going disposition. Over the years, the description has been widely altered to describe male homosexuals, with females being referred to as lesbians. This is quite a departure from earlier descriptions such as “queers”, “faggots”, “homos” and for females, “dykes”. The power of language to influence perceptions is amazing because these earlier descriptions correctly depicted homosexuals as deviants or perverted individuals. The word gay in its modern usage appears to have softened this picture somewhat in the minds of many people. The net effect is to project the homosexual lifestyle as an acceptable alternative, even cool and trendy!

2. Homophobia – Homophobia is an American word, in which “phobia,” means intense fear at the level of mental disorder. Thus, a “homophobe” literally means person filled with such fear and hatred of homosexuals that he is mentally unbalanced. What a laugh! I really have to hand it to faggots. This definition even got into our dictionaries and has been accepted without question. However, I want to offer a new definition for the majority of us who are proud homophobes. Here goes: Homophobia is a RATIONAL REJECTION of the homosexual lifestyle and all those who advocate it. Sorry faggots, we don’t FEAR you. We just HATE what you are and what you do.

3. Liberal – Homosexuals often use this word to urge people to discard traditional values and thinking regarding their disordered lifestyle. Failure to do this on the grounds of conscience or commonsense, you end up being branded “old-fashioned”. The gap between a man who “traditionally” sleeps with women and a man who chooses to sleep with men is so huge, no amount of liberal jargon can reconcile their two mental states. If you are a straight normal guy, no matter how liberal you want to be, the idea of a fellow man making love to another man will forever remain revolting and nauseous.

4. Diversity – This is one of the favourite and most elastic terms used by homosexuals. They often talk of “sexual diversity” to encourage the acceptance of homosexuality as “a different yet normal sexual behaviour”. In a way, it implies that the repugnant homosexual lifestyle enriches our human sexuality in the same way as cultural diversity. This argument might as well be used to justify Paedophilia, Necrophilia and Bestiality. 

5. Tolerance – Homosexual activists would have you believe that tolerance for them requires total acceptance and approval of their lifestyle, but that is not obligatory, nor prudent. In fact, discrimination against homosexual behavior is necessary to protect your society from the consequences of “gay” culture, which always pushes for greater and greater liberalism in sexual attitudes, especially among young people.

To see the danger of this we need look no further than Holland, where sexual liberalism promoted by the homosexual movement has led to the creation of a pedophile political party, whose right to hold seats in parliament, to advocate for the legalization of adult/child sexual relationships, has been approved by the Dutch courts.

Source – Scott Lively – A Letter to the Lithuanian People – 27th March 2007
 

A church minister officiating in a wedding ceremony between two men somewhere in North America. Is this insanity what homosexuals refer to as "diversity"?

6. Progressive – See no. 3 above and subtitute “Liberal” for “Progressive”.

7. Conservatives – Homosexuals and abortion advocates have continued to use this description against people who disagree with them to imply rigidity of thought. Homosexuals use this term to label anyone who maintains that sexual intercourse should only take place between a man and a woman

8. Puritans – See No. 7 above.

9. Bigots – In its original meaning, the word denoted a superstitious, religious zealot; somebody with strong opinions who refused to accept other views. Faggots use this term in the context of racial bigotry in an attempt to put at par racial discrimination and homosexual rejection. What an insult.

10. Haters – Any one who disagrees with the homosexual lifestyle.

11. Ignorant – See also no. 10 above. Homosexuals love using this word as if normal people do not know what their lifestyle is all about. Many a time, this word will be used together with this sentence: “Get enlightened or educated before talking about homosexuality.” Well, how much “education” or “enlightenment” does a normal person need to understand that a man having sex with another man is downright bizarre?

12. Heterosexist – Now, I have to admit that this is pretty new one but its now gaining currency in America. Again, faggots use it to accuse people who disagree with their lifestyle of discrimination in favour of heterosexuals. Almost like gender sexism, as if homosexuals are members of a third gender!

13. Religious – See no. 7, 8 and 9 above. In the world of faggots, anyone whose core values are guided by faith is not worth listening to. What would such a person know anyway? If a christian or muslim condemns homosexuality, the reaction from faggots has been, “Never mind the message – they are just being religious.”

14. Love – Homosexuals have really made this timeless word very dirty. In defence of their lifestyle, they accuse everyone else of hating them, yet they are just promoting love. Yes, there can be brotherly love between two male friends but how this eventually translates into sex, only a faggot can answer. What in actual fact they are hiding with the word “Love” is an abnormal lust between two men who should otherwise be loving and lusting after women.

15. Consenting adults – Used in this context – “As long as two adults of the same gender consent to having sex, what is the problem with that?” The history of homosexuals has time and again proven that there’s no boundary when it comes to adult faggots engaging young boys for illicit sex. The North American Men/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) clearly illustrates my point.

16. Transphobe – The latest in a long list of ridiculous lexicons invented by faggots. This one describes people who can’t accept people who claim to belong to the opposite gender but they were born in the “wrong” one. For example, “women” who claim to be “trapped” in men’s bodies, and vice versa. These are the so-called ‘Transgenders’ (the “T” in LGBT). Psychiatrists have a name for this condition – Its called Gender identity confusion.

In defending and promoting the homosexual lifestyle, these words continue to be employed regularly during many debates in the West. It’s an ingenious method to shut down rational debate on the topic of homosexuality. The strategy may have worked in America and Europe, but it will never work in Kenya. Tough luck faggots. We know how the game is played.

BLAKE

The Truth About Homosexuality

Welcome to the first Kenyan non-religious site dedicated to mobilising people against the repulsive, destructive and depraved homosexual lifestyles advocated by emerging gay lobbies in the country. I’m calling out to Kenyans of all faiths and political persuasions, to unite and reject these perverts and their activities.

This site is a continuation of a raging debate launched over two years ago in goggle’s blogger at the spot http://kenyansagainstgays.blogspot.com. Unfortunately, Google, like so many other American Corporations finally succumbed last month to powerful homosexual forces to shut down a rational voice opposed to the despicable and sick homosexual lifestyles being promoted in Kenya.

Let us now see whether WordPress will also sell out to the Western Inspired Homosexual Culture that is now almost fully accepted in America and Europe. In Kenya, Sections 162 to 165 of the Penal Code criminalizes homosexual behaviour and attempted homosexual behaviour between men, referring to it as “carnal knowledge against the order of nature”. The penalty is 5 to 14 years’ imprisonment.

For the sake of keeping a public record of all the FACTS I’ve collected over the last two years regarding the homosexual movement, I will periodically reproduce here, previous but useful posts which are now not  visible at the blogger spot. This valuable information will greatly assist Kenyans to rationally confront the LIES  behind Homosexuality and ultmately reject the sick lifestyle unequivocally using Factual knowledge.

Posted by BLAKE