How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 2 – Sexual abuse of children

A poster by the homosexual group North American Men/Boy Lovers Association (NAMBLA) celebrating the sexual molestation of young boys.

Today I continue to shine an unrelenting spotlight on the destructive homosexual lifestyle that American President Barrack Obama and UK’s Prime Minister David Cameron are determined to foist on the rest of the world. To most right-thinking human beings, no other form of child abuse is as revolting and devastating as the sexual molestation of children. In this second series on how homosexuality destroys human societies, I’m going to unapologetically expose the strong linkages between the practice of homosexuality and the sexual violation of children.

The rampant sexual abuse of young boys has over the years remained a defining characteristic of the homosexual lifestyle’s horrific mode of recruitment. Despite objections by homosexual lobbies and their sympathizers, credible research continues to show that very often a majority of homosexuals had their own initial same-sex encounter with an adult while children.

A review on a research conducted on the molestation of boys (Holmes and Slap, 1998), and published in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), showed that adolescent boys who were sexually abused by men were up to 7 times more likely to identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual later in life. A study by Freund & Watson (1992), which was reported in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, found that “homosexual males were three times more likely than straight men to engage in adult-child sexual relations.”

According to a 2002 study by Steve Baldwin – Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement – pedophilia occurs far more commonly among homosexuals than among heterosexuals on a per capita basis. “It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh,” wrote Baldwin. “However, it is time to acknowledge that homosexual behavior threatens the foundation of Western civilization – the nuclear family.” The Family Research Council of America supports these findings through the key concept of proportionality in understanding the repugnant phenomena by offering some empirical evidence here.

In addition, Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover says in his book Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, that there is a “substantial, influential, and growing segment of the homosexual community that neither hides nor condemns pedophilia.” The North American Men/Boy Lovers Association (NAMBLA) is a classic example. There was once a lesbian version going by the name “Butterfly Kisses” based in the Netherlands.

Not surprisingly, several prominent homosexuals have agreed with these findings. Writing in a May 1992 publication of The Advocate, a homosexual known as Carl Maves frankly confessed: “How many gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable, liberating experience – one that initiated them into their sexuality – if it weren’t for this so-called molestation?” The Advocate (established in 1967) is the oldest continuing homosexual magazine in the United States.

Kevin Bishop, an admitted pederast (pedophile), has been promoting the work of NAMBLA in South Africa. Bishop, who was molested at the age of six, is also an admitted homosexual who is blunt about the relationship between homosexuality and pedophilia. “Scratch the average homosexual and you will find a pedophile,” said Bishop in an interview with the Electronic Mail & Guardian (June 30, 1997). According to a 2005 essay by Brian Clowes, PhD., and David Sonnier – Child Molestation by homosexuals and heterosexualsthis candid revelation is shared by homosexual leaders who admit a natural link between their lifestyle and child sexual abuse. Its no wonder Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the top adviser to the Pope, blamed homosexuality not celibacy for the rampant sexual abuse of young boys in the Catholic Church through a widely reported statement to the media.

Abolishing legal barriers to sex with children 

Despite gay activists denial that they want easy access to boys, homosexual groups in the west have over the last decade lobbied hard to not only lower the age of sexual consent laws in their countries, but to abolish them altogether if possible. This has been the tragic reality in secular western nations that continue to affirm so-called “gay rights” with dangerous consequences on the safety of their own children. Believe it or not, a pedophile political party in the Netherlands has aggressively been campaigning for the sexual age of consent to be lowered from 16 to 12 years for boys. The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party was launched in 2006 to also push for the legalization of child pornography and sex with animals.

In England, a major campaign is underway to lower the age of sexual consent for homosexuals from 16 to 14. The homosexual organization OutRage! has been leading the crusade. In a statement published on the Queer Intelligence Service website, OutRage! claimed that “under-age queers have rights too. They are some of the most vulnerable members of our community. We have a special responsibility to protect their interests and welfare.”

In America, homosexuals have brazenly attempted to gain unfettered access into the Boy Scouts movement of America (BSA). In 2000, a lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of New Jersey to compel the BSA to accept homosexual scout masters (BSA et al. v. Dale). BSA asserted that “homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the values embodied in the Scout Oath and Law, particularly those represented by the terms “morally straight” and “clean,” and that the organization does not want to promote homosexual conduct as a legitimate form of behavior.” The court ruled in BSA’s favour declaring that their constitutional right to freedom of association gave them authority to expel a gay assistant Scoutmaster, James Dale.

To appease homosexual activists, Philadelphia City officials amazingly began searching for a way to punish the scouts for this ruling. On May 31, 2007 the City Council voted 16-1 to break a 79-year-old agreement allowing the Cradle of Liberty Council of the Boy Scouts to occupy a building in a city park. The Scouts built the building in 1928, and turned it over to the city in exchange for a rent-free lease “in perpetuity.” Apparently, “perpetuity” in Philadelphia now meant, “until gay groups boot you out.” The Scouts could stay only if they opened their ranks to open homosexuals. The Scouts filed a lawsuit in May 2008 claiming their civil rights were being violated. Once again they prevailed and the city was compelled to return the building to the Scouts.

Away from these despicable legal efforts to normalize sex with children, some homosexual activists have promoted the idea that keeping children from sexual activity is actually a form of child abuse. In fact, one homosexual magazine once hailed pedophiles as prophets of sexual freedom! An editorial in the July 1995 issue of Guide magazine declared:

Kids are still being taught destructive lies about sex. They are told that until they are 16 (or 14 or some other arbitrary age that varies from state to state) … any sexual expression on their part means a crime is being committed. We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual, that they deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose. … We cannot, however, always be proud of the way we as a community have treated our prophets. … We must listen to our prophets. Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality…” (Source – York F.V., Knight R.H (1998). Homosexual Behavior & Pedophilia, pp 4).

Granted that our local media continues to highlight the tragedy of child sexual molestations by heterosexuals, more worrying also is the growing phenomenon of young boys being sodomised in various parts of the country. It’s likely that a more assertive homosexual movement encouraged by a friendlier judiciary led by their biggest ally – Chief Justice Willy Mutunga – is fueling these despicable activities. From the well-attested research findings shared above, I submit that legitimization of the homosexual lifestyle would dramatically increase the sexual abuse of young Kenyan children to unimaginable levels. Our children deserve to be protected from all attempts to legitimize homosexuality in the country by western-funded gay organizations.

Tags:

59 Responses to “How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 2 – Sexual abuse of children”

  1. Kim Says:

    Nice research Blake.
    You know what the homophiles and progay ppl are going to say about this?
    That men who penetrate boys are heterosexual and are only targeting boys because they have “access” to them.
    Therefore your next article should seek to prove that men who sexually assault prepubescent boys are INDEED homosexuals.
    Keep them coming.

  2. Blake Says:

    Thanks for your comments Kim.

    Research has made it patently clear that men who sodomise young boys are themselves homosexual. It beggars belief that a heterosexual man would ever be sexually attracted to a young boy! I can understand sexual fantasies about a young girl by a normal man – but a young boy?? Only a homosexual man can sexually desire a young boy – for example the late Michael Jackson and the scandals at his Neverland ranch. Any other explanation is simply irrational and inconceivable.

    • truthsay3r Says:

      The research actually shows exactly the conclusion which you dismiss. Here is just one example of a study on it.
      Groth et al. 1978, Archives Of Sexual Behavior, 7(3), 175-181:
      “All regressed offenders, whether their victims were male or female children, were heterosexual in their adult orientation.”
      “The possibility emerges that homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia may be mutually exclusive and that the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater risk to the underage child than does the adult homosexual male.”
      http://www.springerlink.com/content/tr7388256l7437xh/

  3. James Earl Whitaker Says:

    Anti-homosexual crusaders seem to be more desperate than ever before. You use shady research and questionable interpretations as your principle arms. Why? Using honest research will always render a better position. You cannot hide from the truth. If homosexual behavior is dangerous for society it will be known, if it is not, it will also be known. Truth always comes out, and lately, it seems your position is sinking faster and faster.

    You talk about a connection between pedophilia and homosexuality, but nowhere do you show this connection. You talk about the The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party which is a pedophile party, and not a homosexual party. Furthermore, this party has virtually no support from the gay community.

    You headline your piece with N.A.M.L.A., but forget to mention that this organization is over 30 years old and has been losing members and prominence as time goes on. At this time, the group is virtually non-existant apart from a few members on a website. The group certainly does not represent the gay community at large. Actually, many prominent gay activists fought against this very organization. Something which would be utterly strange if gays and pedophiles were truly connected.

    Your article convinces us of the opposite. If there was a connection, you would have much better “prove” for it. You wouldn’t desperately misinterpret information in order to “prove” your claims.

    The truth is there is no connection between pedophilia and homosexuality and modern research shows this very clearly. Of course, you will close your eyes because you are no interested in the truth. You are only interested in hating homosexuals.

    http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

    You’re losing the fight – ” The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that “Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children” or that “Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult partner.”1

    By contrast, in a 1999 national poll, the belief that most gay men are likely to molest or abuse children was endorsed by only 19% of heterosexual men and 10% of heterosexual women. Even fewer – 9% of men and 6% of women – regarded most lesbians as child molesters.

    Consistent with these findings, Gallup polls have found that an increasing number of Americans would allow gay people to be elementary school teachers. For example, the proportion was 54% in 2005, compared to 27% in 1977.”

    http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,002.htm

    Do some more research and read a little. Do not be afraid of truth. And, don’t hate people for no reason.

  4. homosexuals and children; a dangerous combination – They Don't Fool ME! Says:

    […] Best for Children’s Health11 How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 1 [↩]How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 2 – Sexual abuse of children [↩]http://theydontfoolme.com/2477/anti-bullying-activist-is-a-bully-himself/ […]

  5. kn Says:

    Your article is about pedophilia and not where there are two consenting adults. Heterosexuals abuse children but i haven’t seen you open a blog to attack them. You picking one organization(NAMBLA) as your example to attack homosexuals and is like someone picking Lolita( google it) to fight heterosexuality. Have you seen how many porn sites and organizations are out there to promote deviant sex for heterosexuals?

    I don’t think your search has credence when its look at from an eye of someone who proclaims hatred.

    • storyzetu Says:

      i absolutely agree with Kn.are we to dub the whole homosexual population as rapists and pedophiles based on a few organisations?its a sickening thing pedophilia. But get your facts right. Homosexuality n pedophilia are different things.dnt let your personal prejudices come in the way of fair judgement.

    • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

      kn, you stupid fucking dumbass moronic piece of useless shit…

      Sex is NOT about pleasure or love or whatever you stupid genetically deformed maggots wish it to be; if is was, then ALL sex is “good,” you hypocritical piece of dog shit, including sticking your faggot dick up a little boy’s ass, or your depraved brethen who fuck dead people and animals.

      The evolutionary purpose is sex is to procreate, NOT, contrary to the neanderthal mindset of you dumbfuck retards living in society today, to get yourself off, you simple retard. When you ALTER the purpose of sex, to suit your degenerate desires, then you alter it for EVERYONE, not just yourself, you fucking brainless twit. If you can use “love” and “I was born this way” to justify sticking your dick whenever you want, then ANYONE can do the same thing, you faggot trash.

      “Love” does not exist, maggot. It is a chemical reaction that occurs in the brain. If your chemical reactions are justified, not is not some other sick fuck JUST LIKE YOU justified in the chemical reaction that occurs when he sees a preteen boy?

      The world would be a better place if all you sick fucks were rounded up and burned as heat for the homeless in a third world country.

      • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

        “If you chemical reactions are justified, then* are* not some other suck fucks*…”

      • truthsay3r Says:

        P01
        YOU WROTE: “Sex is NOT about pleasure or love… if is was, then ALL sex is “good,””

        Sex is about whatever those who engage in it make it about. It is morally legitimate, or not, based upon whether those who engage in it are doing so of their own free will, free from excessive coercion. The reality is that most people engage in sex for pleasure and/or love, though this is irrelevant to its morality. Short comments due to invisible word limit.

        Purpose is subjectively projected by us on to reality by us and at no point dictates what something “should” be used for. Feel free to demonstrate otherwise. It may demonstrate what it is advisable to use something for but the person that gets to decide how best to use things… is the one using them.

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          truthsay3r,

          The reason why you are an idiotic, useless faggot is because you cannot separate your DESIRE for reality should be, from what reality ACTUALLY is.

          Nature does not care about what YOU or I want, you faggot.
          Reality does not care about what YOU or I want to “make it,” you queer piece of shit.

          Neither do not care about “morals.”

          You fucking retard.

          Here’s a few more realities that you need to wake up to, you dumb faggot. Firstly, there is no such thing as “free will,” especially to faggots like yourself who think of nothing but fulfilling your most animalistic of desires: eating, sleeping, and fucking. Secondly, there is no such thing as “love.” You can give it all the sweet names you like, but it does not exist. In your next vomit of stupidity, you bring up “subjectivity,” as if “love” is not the ultimate abstraction of the base chemical reaction that leads to sexual intercourse.

          You can continue ignore these points, because they diverge from your uncontrollable inclination to stick your penis into anything that moves (like an animal,) but, they are the brutal realities to the nature of an uncaring world.

          Stupid bitch.

          • truthsay3r Says:

            YOU WROTE: “there is no such thing as “free will,””

            Possibly not, though it isn’t really possible to definitively determine at this time. What is your point?

            YOU WROTE: “like yourself who think of nothing but fulfilling your most animalistic of desires: eating, sleeping, and fucking.”

            Which of those 3 does replying to your comments fall under?

            YOU WROTE: “Secondly, there is no such thing as “love.””

            How do you come to that conclusion & what’s it’s relevance?

            YOU WROTE: “You can continue ignore these points”

            Never did in the first place. What is their relevance?

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          truthsay3r,

          “Possibly not, though it isn’t really possible to definitively determine at this time. What is your point?”

          You don’t have the evolutionary capability of understanding my point. If everyone has the “free will” to engage in the “pleasure” of sticking their penis into something, then YOU CAN NOT RESTRICT ANYONE of this action, you fucking moronic imbecile.

          YOU ABSOLUTELY CANNOT DEFINE YOUR OWN PURPOSE FOR SOMETHING YOU CLAIM IS PURPOSELESS, YOU STUPID FAGGOT.

          If sex is for getting off, than ANYONE can get off INTO anything they want, including an eight year old boy, you dumb faggot. That is the PATH that YOUR idiocy leads towards.

          “Which of those 3 does replying to your comments fall under?”

          The fucking part, because that’s what you’re trying to justify, you filthy, diseased animal.

          “How do you come to that conclusion & what’s it’s relevance?”

          It’s relevance is that if you can spout off a bunch of dumb, bullshit that DOES NOT EXIST to justify sticking your penis into a man, a dog, a child, or a dead body…

          …it seems you need to prove this thing exists, faggot.

          “Never did in the first place. What is their relevance?”

          Semantics and deflections, wouldn’t expect anything less from a pedophile like you.

          • truthsay3r Says:

            @please die you idiot
            YOU WROTE: “If everyone has the “free will” to engage in the “pleasure” of sticking their penis into something, then YOU CAN NOT RESTRICT ANYONE”

            Sounds like you’re changing your use of the word “free will”. Your original point was that free will doesn’t exist I.E. that our actions are predetermined. Now you’re using “free will” to mean “the right to” it seems…. so I will clarify.

            Whether or not we have true free will remains undetermined as we don’t fully understand cognition.

            Everybody has the right to do whatever they want by default I.E. until it is justified that they do not. I, like virtually everybody else, would “restrict” those who would sexually assault others. Unlike everybody else, who typically do so on the basis of cultural norms/ stigma, I would do so by applying the rationale that harmonious coexistence, which is in all of our interests, can only be maintained when we refrain from forcing others to engage in highly undesirable things, such as sexually assaulting them, for our personal gratification. Many “lesser of two evils” situations may result from this.

            YOU WROTE: “YOU ABSOLUTELY CANNOT DEFINE YOUR OWN PURPOSE FOR SOMETHING YOU CLAIM IS PURPOSELESS”

            Of course you can foolish one. To point out that something is objectively purposeless specifically opens up the possibility of subjectively assigning purposes. Not that this is merely a case of me claiming it… or hoping that it is so… the burden of proof is with those who claim an objective purpose and they haven’t met it. There are definitions of “purpose” which allow for it to be objective within the context of those definitions…. but this is not the type of “purpose” you refer to.

            YOU WROTE: “If sex is for getting off, than ANYONE can get off INTO anything they want, including an eight year old boy,”

            Incorrect foolish one. “Purpose” is not related to morality. Only morons such as yourself conflate the two. Here you simply project your own stupidity on to me and assume that my thinking is similarly backward to your own.

            YOU WROTE:”The fucking part, because that’s what you’re trying to justify”.

            I’ve already explained to you multiple times simple one… nothing requires justification by default.

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          Faggot.

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          At the moment, it seems I cannot reply in the other thread, faggotseek3r, what sort of queermagic have you wrought?

          “Sounds like you’re changing your use of the word “free will”. ”
          Jesus Christ, you’re a stupid fucking flaming pile of faggot shit.

          YOU said, “It is morally legitimate, or not, based upon whether those who engage in it are doing so of their own free will…”

          YOU wrote that, faggot. Not me, YOU. You are relinquishing the decision to participate in intercourse to each individual person, that is your definition of free will. So a faggot can fuck a faggot, a faggot can fuck a child, a faggot can fuck their faggot partner’s dead body, and a faggot can fuck an animal.

          How much of a dumb fucking idiot are you that you can’t see the obviousness of the path which your animalistic fuckfuckfuckanythingandeverything mentality leads to? You can’t say, “BUT IF U IZ FUKIN ON UR OWN FREE WILL, DATS PURFEKLY OK,” and then turn around and publicly say, “OMG IM NOT SAYIN U CAN FUK A KID,” (even though that’s your ultimate goal) you twisted faggot.

          If you’re ok with two faggot thirteen year olds fucking each other, then you’re ok with a faggot forty-eight year old pedofaggot fucking one of those thirteen year olds. If you’re ok with a ten year old faggot fucking an eight year old faggot, you’re ok with an twenty-eight year old faggot fucking a ten year old. You faggot.

          Or deny you deny children have the capability of “free will?” What? Are you ageist? You fucking fairy pedophile faggot.

          “Whether or not we have true free will remains undetermined as we don’t fully understand cognition.”

          You’re obsessed with sticking your penis into anything that slightly resembles a hole, queerbag, how can you even question whether or not you have “free will?”

          You don’t.

          You’re an idiotic, pathetic slave to your natural desires. Genetic feces. You’re not different from an animal whose only concerns in life are finding something to eat and drink, sleeping, and fucking anything it can.

          “Everybody… blah fucking blah blah I like gay sex, adult-child sex, adult-animal sex, and dead body sex… this.”

          I get it, already, you silly faggot. You want to tear everything down, so that nothing exists. You’re not different from any other bleeding heart liberal faggot who is so full of self-hate he must destroy everything that reminds him he’s nothing more than a millennial of putrid, genetic shit.

          You would “rather” ‘exist harmoniously’ because your genes are deficient, and you realize and understand this, although you deny it. Social conformity is your priority because without it, you would have no way of the assurance of your pathetic existence.

          There are no such things as “rights,” you faggot, only power. The current institution of power takes the weak and mindless, like you faggots, under its wing, and grants you the illusion of “rights” and “free will,” as long as you mime its agenda and spread its “equality” (read: corporatism) throughout the world. But you have no problem with this, because in a world without “harmonious coexistence,” you would be someone’s bitch or dead.

          In the back of your mind, you realize this, faggot.

          It is not the interest of all that you wish to maintain, you hypocritical faggot, it is your own.

          “To point out that something is objectively purposeless specifically opens up the possibility of subjectively assigning purposes.”

          Faggot, just come right out and say you support adult men fucking little boy and girls. No need to dance around like a fairy faggot any further, you disgusting piece of horse shit.

          “‘Purpose’ is not related to morality.”

          Exactly, you fucking imbecile, which is how you continue justifying fucking newborn children.

          “I’ve already explained to you multiple times simple one… nothing requires justification by default.”

          Faggot, you avoid my point by questioning whether I understand you – I do understand you, queerbag. I realize and am fully aware that you wish to stick your penis into that of a child, the reason for my continued commentary towards your undeveloped mind is so that you can stop hiding your true intentions from the masses of idiots who truly believe that your sick, perverted kind will stop at just spreading fecal diseases into the straight community.

          Stop prancing along like a faggot, and come clean: tell us how badly you want to fuck your neighbor’s children, you filthy animal.

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          In nature, the evolutionary, the only natural, purpose of sexual intercourse is procreation. Anything else is altering the true purpose for their own advantage.

          “Humans,” though I guess I should say “true humans,” so as not to include pedophile genetic trash like faggotseek3r, differ from animals in one and only one way. It is this difference that has allowed (some of) humanity to suppress our base reactions, in order to dominate and alter the world according to our preferences.

          But the more comfortable we become with just living, the less we use the ability that allowed us to reach this “level” in the first place. queerseek3r and other idealistic liberal faggots are not leading us toward some new, never-before-seen world, they merely wish to return us back to our base, idiotic state of animalistic nature.

      • truthsay3r Says:

        P02
        YOU WROTE: “If you can use “love” and “I was born this way” to justify sticking your dick whenever you want…”.

        Your simplistic understanding of morality is evident from both the contents and the wording of what you say and is ironically why you misunderstand your opponents position.

        No moral justification is needed for any action by default. It is for others to justify that we are immoral, not for us to be considered guilty of every accusation until we prove our innocence (innocent until proven guilty).

        YOU WROTE: “The world would be a better place if all you sick fucks were rounded up and burned”.

        It is always ironic when those who advocate torturing people to death attempt to profess the moral high ground.

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          truthsay3r,

          “Your simplistic understanding of morality…”

          And the faggot who believes in “free will” and “love” like he’s no different from a dumb ape, slave to his physical fulfillments, is going to teach me about “morality,” I presume?

          Don’t make me cry… from laughter.

          “It is always ironic when those who advocate torturing people to death attempt to profess the moral high ground.”

          hurr durr, you dumb fuck, dick sucking piece of primordial shit, did I claim a “moral high ground?” You introduced the digression with your last post, you dumbfuck idiot.

          You seem to misunderstand me in two ways, I would not want to burn people like you for “torture.” That would imply keeping you alive. I want you dead. I suggested incineration as the primary solution, so your necrophiliac, degenerate brothers could not dig up your bodies and use them to continue spreading your diseases throughout the planet. Furthermore, your “moral high ground” includes the unnecessary deaths of over thirty million people, and the future deaths of the same amount, plus.

          Nature eliminates species who are not fit to survive. It does not care for your “morality,” and neither do I.

          • truthsay3r Says:

            YOU WROTE: “did I claim a “moral high ground?” You introduced the digression with your last post”

            Incorrect, you implied an issue of moral contention when YOU WROTE: “If you can use “love” and “I was born this way” to justify sticking your dick whenever you want…”.

            YOU WROTE: “your “moral high ground” includes the unnecessary deaths of over thirty million people, and the future deaths of the same amount, plus.”

            Which 30 million are they then?

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          shitspeak3r,

          “Incorrect, you implied an issue of moral contention”

          No, I didn’t, you dumbass idiot, you’re just clearly incapable of having this kind of discussion outside the realm of the arguments of organized religions, thus your inept brain automatically resorts to searching for a spiritual or moral foundation in an philosophy in which none have been mentioned.

          “Which 30 million are they then?”

          As I said above, here you are in the “grasping for straws” phase of your retorts. Nothing to legitimate to say, so just say whatever.

          I go through this with every half-step away from being a homo faggot who thinks all they need to do is deny Christian morality exists in order to justify their base, animalistic tendencies.

          Your puerile, brainwashed ideals were lost the moment you replied to me, faggot.

          • truthsay3r Says:

            @Please due, you idiots
            YOU: “did I claim a “moral high ground?” You introduced the digression with your last post”
            ME: “Incorrect, you implied an issue of moral contention when YOU WROTE: “If you can use “love” and “I was born this way” to justify sticking your dick whenever you want…”.
            YOU: “No, I didn’t, you dumbass idiot, you’re just clearly incapable of having this kind of discussion outside the realm of the arguments of organized religions, thus your inept brain automatically resorts to searching for a spiritual or moral foundation”

            When you refer to “justifying” something in the context above, what other than a moral justification can you be referring to? There is no rational justification for sexual impulses, nor does there need to be. Go ahead, reference procreation, see what happens lol.

            The rest of your comment doesn’t address the second quotation of me which you provide. I find Christian morality irrelevant and it is you who assumes its relevance and raised it as a topic, not I. My morality supersedes that of the Abrahamic religions.

            Asking what the hell you mean by the “deaths of over 30 million” is not “grasping at straws”, it is asking for clarification of your insanity, an unfortunate necessity due to your mental incontinence.

  6. Blake Says:

    kn & storyzetu,

    What part of my article don’t you understand? Its patently clear from the research and what homsexual leaders have been confessing over the years – that there’s an unambiguous natural link between their lifestyle and child sexual abuse!

    As for the consenting homosexual adults – what part of Carl Maves frank confession back in 1992 don’t you get? “How many gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable, liberating experience – one that initiated them into their sexuality – if it weren’t for this so-called molestation?”

    Kevin Bishop, another prominent homosexual says: “Scratch the average homosexual and you will find a pedophile”.

    And you dare come and tell Kenyans that there’s no link between homosexuality and the abuse of young boys???? Sorry to have to tell you this but your love for sexual perversion has clearly made you illiterate and irrational.

    • truthsay3r Says:

      Anecdotes from paedophiles who want to piggyback on the LGBT civil rights movement prove nothing whatsoever… nor do any anecdotes of any kind prove anything about the LGBT population as a whole. You only used 2 peer-reviewed studies above (which I’ll address in other comments). The rest was entirely anecdotes.
      Steve Baldwin’s “study” isn’t posted in a peer-reviewed journal and he is part of an extreme-right wing political movement, not a researcher. The family research council is a hate group btw according to the international civil rights organisation the Southern Poverty Law Centre.

    • truthsay3r Says:

      One of your own studies refutes your claim (Freund & Watson, 1992, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 18(1), 34-43) when it notes that “This, of course, would not indicate that androphilic males have a greater propensity to offend against children.”
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756

      Another by the same researcher. Freund et al. 1989, The Journal of Sex Research, 26(1), 107-117:
      “Homosexual males who preferred physically mature partners responded no more to male children than heterosexual males who preferred physically mature partners responded to female children”

    • truthsay3r Says:

      Your only other peer-reviewed study is by Holmes & Slap. 3 part response (stupid word limit). Part 1
      The Holmes & Slap review that you cite bases the 7x statistic on it’s references 83 and 84. Both are by the same authors and 84, is entitled “Past sexual victimization by FEMALES of male patients in an adolescent medicine clinic population”.
      These references 83/84 collectively involve a “study group of 40… in an adolescent medicine clinic”. Clearly generalising this to all victims of molestation would be absurd.

    • truthsay3r Says:

      Holmes & Slap response part 2:
      Many of Holmes & Slap’s reviewed studies had definitions of “molestation” that would lead to a consensual sexual relationship between a 17 and an 18 year old or a 15 and 20 year old as being labelled “molestation”. See tables 1 and 2 of your own source.
      Holmes & Slap 1998, JAMA, 280(21), 1855-1862:
      “No longitudinal studies examined the causal relationship between abuse and gender role or sexual orientation, however. Gender role nonconformity and gay or bisexual identity may precede abuse.”

    • truthsay3r Says:

      Holmes & Slap response Part 3
      Rind et al. 1999, JAMA, 281(23), 2185: “In our 3 published literature reviews on the sexual abuse of boys, we documented, and then avoided, methodological shortcomings of previous reviews. Drs Holmes and Slap, however, repeated these shortcomings, thereby compromising the value of their review.
      First, in examining “sequelae,” they relied too heavily on clinical samples, which are highly atypical and do not generalize, as we have shown both narratively and statistically”.
      That Rind et al. quote is a letter published in the same journal as your Holmes & Slap review, harshly criticising it. It is also noteworthy that it particularly singles out Slap’s conclusions about “sequelae”, which is the heading in your review under which your 7x stat is noted. That statistic is also based upon a clinical sample… another explicit criticism of Rind et al.
      Only 11% of Slap’s reviewed studies even asked if coercion was involved in the “molestations”.

  7. Anya Says:

    Keep on writing, Blake. You have plenty of supporters. I am from Pakistan, and I whole-heartedly support your cause. And thank you for using correct English. Anyone who uses politically correct English is siding with homophiles, whether he realises this or not.

    God be with Kenya.

  8. Blake Says:

    Hi Anya,

    Welcome to the blog and thanks for the support. As long as I draw breath on this earth, I will continue to expose here and elsewhere the horrendous lies behind the homosexual movement and their campaign for legitimisation in Kenya and across the world. How’s the situation in Pakistan?

  9. JSK Says:

    The Journal of the American Medical Association actually states that 98% of male perpetrators self-identified as heterosexual!! You can read it yourself! Sexual relationships between consenting adults and sexual abuse of children is NOT the same thing!

    • Blake Says:

      JSK, I will re-state this again just in case you missed it in an earlier comment (May 10th).

      What part of my article don’t you understand? Its patently clear from the research and what homosexual leaders have been confessing over the years – that there’s an unambiguous natural link between their lifestyle and child sexual abuse!

      As for the consenting homosexual adults – what part of Carl Maves frank confession back in 1992 don’t you get? “How many gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable, liberating experience – one that initiated them into their sexuality – if it weren’t for this so-called molestation?”

      Kevin Bishop, another prominent homosexual says: “Scratch the average homosexual and you will find a pedophile”.

      And you dare come and tell Kenyans that there’s no link between homosexuality and the abuse of young boys???? Sorry to have to tell you this but your love for sexual perversion has clearly made you illiterate and irrational.

  10. How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 3 – Increased immorality « Kenyans Against Homosexuality Says:

    […] Kenyans Against Homosexuality Confronting Homosexuality with Facts « How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 2 – Sexual abuse of children […]

  11. Maisha Says:

    Reblogged this on Maisha.

  12. Jeannie Says:

    consumers offer modern functions like, online controls, detachable brewing models, programmed
    timers, revolving durability, plates control, automatic cup lifts for
    variable sizes, and built in grinders. Drip Coffee Maker Commonly Asked Questions
    what is definitely the best heat for brewing coffee? all specialists think which 200 levels is easily the most effective temperature
    for brewing coffee.

  13. thesoulfactory.com Says:

    And even more powerful is actually the way that, Mental Photography exercises the
    brain. Something to start thinking about carefully is actually how you
    definitely will attract a person to your booth, because they will be
    hiking beyond many. As part of this sort of wedding photography, photographers usually mix the background
    because well as photograph events.

  14. Lunette de soleil cats ray ban 2013 Says:

    Manufacturer de lunettes de soleil reconnues fondé comme de 1937 par Bausch
    et aussi Lomb, l’Interdiction de Ray a géré à écrit le premièrement solaire tombé sur vraiment un incroyable achievements. le les lunettes de soleil d’Interdiction de Ray bon
    marché a tendance à être avec non question un particulier populaire
    et aussi le monde solaire célèbre, et aussi ce particulier énorme les succès je vraiment A mérité
    because. guys sans aucun doute fera a apprécié la courbe agressive de ceci set de les lunettes
    qui do pas paserra inaperçu.

  15. rosannecash.com Says:

    Fashion marketers devraitest en positionpour lier
    les tylistes de mode et égalementles consommateurs.éviter élégantfashions etdcp quialler de style intérieurtrois à
    6mois. enn faisant ce particulier etessayer via vêtements vous pourraitPas
    communément choisir pourraitaideaugmenter votre très proprependeries flexibilité et également laissezdes signifiepou croître votre très proprestyle.

    bon vêtements pourraitdéfier age et également
    en outre préparervous devenir jeunes.

  16. mat Says:

    if your kid came to you and asked you what you would do if he or she was gay, what will you say, i will shoot you in the face?, disown you? after that your kid commits suicide leaving you a suicide note thanking you for your great advice then am sure you will be proud of your self in your fight against homosexuality.

    • Blake Says:

      Mat, I will lovingly tell my kid that their chosen lifestyle was wrong at so many levels, show them how it would utterly destroy their lives physically and eventually spiritually, and then warn them of the coming doom when they eventually meet our Maker. But I would never lie to them that everything will turn out right because of their new found gayness.

      • truthsay3r Says:

        Ah but you would be lying to them, or at least telling them things that you had no good reason to believe were true. There is no more a “homosexual lifestyle” than there is a heterosexual one. They’re both heterogeneous populations. What physical destruction do you anticipate would result from homosexuality?
        Your claim about meeting a “maker” would be unsubstantiated. Please prove me wrong.

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          truthsay3r, you’re partially correct. In this modern age of stupid fuck pieces of mindless shit like you, the differences between heterosexual “lifestyles” and faggot “lifestyles” have blurred, party because of the establishment media to turn the people of the world into robotic worker drones, who think about NOTHING except what vagina or asshole they’re going to stick their (real or fake) penis into after they’re finished slaving away “at work” for corporations.

          So, yes, in this aspect, you are correct: straight people have now become like you animalistic faggots, screwing everything that comes within a five foot perimeter of their being.

          As far as “physical destruction” goes… you are apart of 4% of the men in the United States who are dirty male-ass fucking genetic feces, YET… you virus-ridden fucks make up 78% of ALL NEW MALE HIV INFECTIONS. That means… 96% of the ENTIRE MALE POPULATION in the United States of America accounts for ONLY 22% of new HIV infections in men. That is statistically INSANE, you dumbfuck faggot.

          You’re destroying yourselves on your own, you scum of the earth, piece of shit. If only the sexually transmitted infections you sex-obsessed, degenerate mutants possessed worked more quickly. Unfortunately…

          • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

            I should add, “…NOTHING except what vagina (or asshole or child or animal or dead body or tree or fruit) they’re…”

          • truthsay3r Says:

            P01
            More simple-minded nonsense. YOU WROTE: “you are apart of 4% of the men in the United States who are dirty male-ass fucking genetic feces”.

            I’m not from the U.S. & I haven’t inserted my penis in to anybody’s anus. You’re foolishly endorsing inaccurate & irrelevant stereotypes.
            Haplerin, 1999, AIDS Patient Care STDS, 13(12), 717-730:
            “In terms of absolute numbers, approximately seven times more women than homosexual men engage in unprotected receptive anal intercourse.”

            If you’re concerned about faeces then campaign for more systematic hand-washing after defecation or better sewage systems in underdeveloped nations.

          • truthsay3r Says:

            P02
            A study of train/ bus commuters, investigating hand-washing frequency, in the UK.found that:
            Judah et al. 2009, Epidemiology and Infection, 138(3), 409-414:
            “Of the 404 people sampled 28% were found to have bacteria of faecal origin on their hands”.

            You might also be concerned about flushing the toilet. Barker & Jones, 2005, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 99(2), 339-347:
            “Many individuals may be unaware of the risk of air-borne dissemination of microbes when flushing the toilet and the consequent surface contamination that may spread infection within the household, via direct surface-to-hand-to mouth contact. Some enteric viruses could persist in the air after toilet flushing and infection may be acquired after inhalation and swallowing”.

          • truthsay3r Says:

            P03
            On the topic of HIV, you’re ill informed again, given that 69% of HIV occurs in Sub-Saharan Africa, where it is transmitted predominantly heterosexually. Lesbians are also at infinitely lower risk of transmission than heteros, while black people are disproportionately affected, both globally & in the U.S. & other nations. Furthermore, much of the transmission between MSM is a consequence of heterosexism.

            Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005:
            “To date, there are no confirmed cases of female-to-female sexual transmission of HIV in the United States database.”

            Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Fact Sheet 1 July 1996, Page 2:
            “Heterosexual (male-female) intercourse accounts for more than 70% of all adult HIV infections to date and homosexual (male-male) intercourse for a further 5-10%.”

          • truthsay3r Says:

            P04
            Martin et al. 2010, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(3), 293–301:
            “The findings provide evidence that American gay and bisexual men may experience a variety of stressful life events, including a surprising amount of victimization, and that at least some episodes of UAS (unprotected anal sex) may be associated with attempts to cope with distress associated with such events”.

            Huso Yi et al. 2010, Health Psychology, 29(2), 205–214:
            “Gay men who reported UAI (unprotected anal intercourse), compared to the men without UAI, reported significantly higher levels of internalized homophobia.”

            Centers for Disease Control:
            “In 2009, blacks/African Americans made up approximately 13% of the population of the 40 states (surveyed) but accounted for 52% of diagnoses of HIV infection.”

            I could elaborate extensively.

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          faggotsay3r-

          “Although MSM represent about 4% of the male population in the United States, in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections.”
          http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html

          CDC means “Center for Disease and Control,” and is a government organization. I guess they’re making up shit to contribute to “homophobia,” huh, you disease-carrying faggot? The fact that pretty much only faggots HAVE AND SPREAD HIV couldn’t possibly be true, right, you denier?

          “If you’re concerned about faeces then campaign for more systematic hand-washing after defecation or better sewage systems in underdeveloped nations.”

          A……….hahahahahahahaha! Right, because we’re already far past gone the stage in the mid-’70s and ’80s where faggots and pedophiles from Western countries were flying to Africa to have have rape and molest little boys and girls, sending the virus into a population that didn’t even have the means to counter “normal” diseases.

          You have a lot of dead Africans to thank, you fairy fuck faggots.

          “n the topic of HIV, you’re ill informed again, given that 69% of HIV occurs in Sub-Saharan Africa, where it is transmitted predominantly heterosexually.”

          Well, duh, you stupid fucking imbecile, up until maybe five years ago, every hospital in the continent looked like the equivalent of a trash dump in America.

          I’m sure that the significant improve in health facilities on the continent has nothing at all with the DRASTIC decreases (by fifty percent in some countries) in both new infections and deaths from AIDs. This is another place an eye rolling emoticon would be useful.

          Also, you do know there are two types of HIV, and within these two types, various subtypes… right, you faggot? One spreads much easily than the other type… but you already knew this, right, faggot?

          “Lesbians are also at infinitely lower risk of transmission than heteros,”

          I’d hardly call titty sucking and fingering “sex,” you fucktarded idiot. You know who has an almost zero risk of transmission rate?

          “black people are disproportionately affected,”

          Black males are also disproportionately thrown in for-profit prisons, where HIV is rampant, and when released, these men come out and spread it to the heterosexual population. But that would be the logical answer, and in truthsay3r’s world, we distort and ignore logic when it conflicts with our degenerate fantasies.

          Both men and women who don’t have sex with people who fuck faggots or poke needles in themselves have a zero risk of transmission. That is a FACT, you faggot.

          “Furthermore, much of the transmission between MSM is a consequence of heterosexism.”

          Incorrect. The TRANSMISSION between MSM is because you faggots are animals who can’t do or think about anything other than group anal sex and tonguing each other’s assholes. The TRANSFER from faggots to the heterosexual community is a consequence of the stigma of being a faggot.

          Looking back, the two better solutions to the problem of faggot-only diseases to the one that we have taken would have been either to allow you fairy fuck faggot queers more freedom to spread your diseases amongst themselves, instead of causing you to hide and spread it amongst normal, non-mentally ill heterosexuals. The problem with this solution is that we inevitably arrive at the issue of confused faggots who claim they that like “men” and “women,” which would have led to the same issue where we have millions of victims of the fatal faggot disease, just over a later period of time.

          You may bitch and whine that if the proper funds had been spent to deter the spread of HIV in faggots, its spread to the normal world could also been somewhat prevented, however, I highly doubt people of the world would approve of needlessly spending billions of dollars on a disease that affects a small amount of the population that can’t stop fucking thousands of different people a year.

          Even now, if the world community as a whole knew the truth about HIV and AIDs, that if you stay away from druggie shit heads and disease-carrying faggots, and men and women who fuck these kinds of people, you will NEVER acquire it, I’m sure that would change many people’s opinions on why we’re spending so much money to prevent a disease that is so easily preventable (to normal, non-sex obsessed, non- disease-ridden, non-mentally unstable people.)

          Or secondly, and I would have preferred this solution, the thousands of you homo, ass-fucking, disease-spreading faggots at the time should’ve been rounded up, along with the (unfortunate) heterosexuals whom they infected with their faggot disease, and cremated, to avoid even more spread of disease by their necrophiliac cousins. This solution is the one nature would have eventually taken, if not for human meddling, preserving the lives of you disease-carrying queers.

          “I could elaborate extensively.”

          You mean, “I could post more links that I haven’t read.”

          You fucking twat.

          • truthsay3r Says:

            I’ve already addressed your childish points about the U.S. HIV prevalence disparity…. see P03 and P04 which you were responding to…

            YOU WROTE: “faggots and pedophiles from Western countries were flying to Africa to have have rape and molest little boys and girls”

            Your usual dose of stupidity… HIV arose in Cameroon… that’s in Africa.

            YOU WROTE: “I’m sure that the significant improve in health facilities on the continent has nothing at all with the DRASTIC decreases”

            Of course the major HIV prevention interventions have made a difference. How is this relevant?

            YOU WROTE: “I’d hardly call titty sucking and fingering “sex,””

            Whether you personally want to call it “sex” or not… though you clearly don’t understand how women have sex lol… is, again, irrelevant.

            YOU WROTE: “in truthsay3r’s world, we distort and ignore logic when it conflicts with our degenerate fantasies.”

            Again you neither evidenced your assertion, nor established its relevance.

            YOU WROTE: “Both men and women who don’t have sex with people who fuck faggots or poke needles in themselves have a zero risk of transmission. That is a FACT”

            Then you’ll have no difficulty in proving it. Go ahead.

            YOU WROTE: “fucking thousands of different people a year.”

            More simple-minded lies. Langstrom et al. 2010, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(1), 75-80:
            “The average number of same-sex sexual partners among those reporting any such partner was 12.86 in men and 3.53 in women”. That’s lifetime partners…
            Time to test the word limit.

        • Please Die, You Idiots Says:

          faggotspeak3r,

          “I’ve already addressed your childish points about the U.S. HIV prevalence disparity…. see P03 and P04 which you were responding to…”

          You mean, you denied. And cried. And complained. And bitched.

          But it does not change the fact that HIV is a faggot-only disease, easily avoidable for the NORMAL, NON-DEVIANT population if you faggots could resist your urge to stick your AIDS-ridden phalluses into heterosexual women.

          “Your usual dose of stupidity… HIV arose in Cameroon… that’s in Africa.”

          Well, first, you idiot, Cameroon is not considered to be ground zero, just your usual old news, retard speak from fag orgs, I presume. Secondly, the origins have nothing to do with its spread, which we have thank sodomy-crazed American faggots for doing during their sex tours to Africa and Haiti in the ’70s and ’80s.

          “Of course the major HIV prevention interventions have made a difference. How is this relevant?”

          This is what happens when you’re a mindless retard who does nothing but link to articles and journals that are beyond your scope of comprehension. Across the world, HIV rates are falling in every single group of people… EXCEPT faggots. And they’re NOT stable in queers, they’re RISING.

          Your claim that epidemic spread of HIV in African countries was solely due to heterosexual relations is preposterous, specifically in light of the fact that it’s dropped by such incredible levels with the rise of cleaner health care facilities.

          Dumb fairy faggot.

          “Whether you personally want to call it “sex” or not… though you clearly don’t understand how women have sex lol… is, again, irrelevant.”

          penis + vagina = sexual intercourse

          Just because you’re a stupid fucking moronic faggot who requires a change in common sense to suit your depravity doesn’t alter this, queerbag.

          “Again you neither evidenced your assertion, nor established its relevance.”

          – only faggots nowadays are being infected with HIV
          – it’s almost impossible for a man to get HIV from a woman
          – the only way for a man or woman to contract the virus is from screwing a faggot or drug user

          If I were a sex-obsessed cock sucker like you, I’d be crying about the “evidence” (read: facts) as well, I suppose.

          “Then you’ll have no difficulty in proving it. Go ahead.”

          The CDC didn’t either, faggot.

          “That’s lifetime partners…”

          Well then you faggots are most disgusting than even I initially believed! Only TWELVE partners a year and you’re still spreading AIDs at the rates you are?

          Time to test extermination, no?

          Alas, though I wish your poorly performed study were true, a sizable portion of faggots have more than a thousand sexual partners a year, and an even larger portion have numbers going into the hundreds. This has been proved by many a study, and the only time faggots seem to care about the vast number of assholes they’ve stuck their penis into is when you connect it to the spread or their disease.

          • truthsay3r Says:

            YOU WROTE: “it does not change the fact that HIV is a faggot-only disease”

            Repeating a lie doesn’t make it come true.

            YOU WROTE: “Cameroon is not considered to be ground zero, just your usual old news, retard speak from fag orgs, I presume.”

            No. Gao et al. 1999, Nature, 397(6718), 436-441

            YOU WROTE: “Across the world, HIV rates are falling in every single group of people… EXCEPT faggots.”

            HIV transmission rates are falling in Africa, where the HIV prevention intervention has been focused and where transmission is predominantly heterosexual.
            HIV rates among MSM are increasing in the U.S., where intervention efforts have substantially declined in the last few decades, as has the visibility/ severity of the disease due to ART, causing a degree of *relative* complacency. Simultaneously, ardent resistance by conservative groups to providing kids with decent sex education leaves them ignorant of the dangers.

            YOU WROTE: “we have thank sodomy-crazed American faggots for doing during their sex tours to Africa and Haiti in the ’70s and ’80s.”

            Please feel free to prove it and establish its relevance to homosexuals today.

            YOU WROTE: “Your claim that epidemic spread of HIV in African countries was solely due to heterosexual relations is preposterous”

            Mostly, not solely, simple one.

            ME: “Again you neither evidenced your assertion, nor established its relevance.”
            YOU: – only faggots nowadays are being infected with HIV
            – it’s almost impossible for a man to get HIV from a woman
            – the only way for a man or woman to contract the virus is from screwing a faggot or drug user

            My response now: Again you neither evidenced your assertion, nor established its relevance. It is true that hetero women are far more at risk of HIV than hetero men, just like the receptive partner in anal intercourse is far more at risk than the insertive partner. Hetero men are still perfectly capable of contracting HIV however.

            ME: “That’s lifetime partners…”
            YOU WROTE: “Well then you faggots are most disgusting than even I initially believed! Only TWELVE partners a year and you’re still spreading AIDs at the rates you are?”

            Do you know what “lifetime” means….? Hint: It doesn’t mean “per year”.

            YOU WROTE: “though I wish your poorly performed study were true, a sizable portion of faggots have more than a thousand sexual partners a year, and an even larger portion have numbers going into the hundreds. This has been proved by many a study”

            My poorly performed nationally representative study… yes…

            Quote and cite the *representative* studies you refer to then, rather than simply asserting their existence. Then you can explain how it is related to homosexuality, given the absence of female homosexual’s promiscuity.

  17. Irritated Genie of Soufeese Says:

    The Militant white-sex Assault (“Homosexuals” Preying on Children)

  18. andy Says:

    Fantastic post. Thank you.

  19. songs about family Says:

    Offer them bonuses that they can also offer in the email they
    send out to their list. You can get on this by
    signing up with email to be one of the testers of the product.
    Each the Nook and i – Pad are coloured and contact
    display screen but soon after a while the back again mild will flip off even though you
    might be studying it.

  20. jdmeyers5280 Says:

    Whatever Right Wing fanatic writing this whole little conservative diatribe obviously has not heard that more sexual depravities are committed by repressed heterosexual males.
    I was used by the straight men in my family, beginning when there weren’t any other adults to look out for me. It wasn’t until I was in my mid 40’s that I found out I’m not biologically related to the family of the man I called Dad. So it became quite clear to me that it made it easier to convince me that I was created by GOD to provide sexual relief to many men in my prepubescent years and all thru my teenage and pre-adult development years.
    I have since found out that my biological father was a homosexual and I’m am a homosexual by genetics. I to this day have never been able to develop adult relationships.
    At 50 years old, I am a retiring male prostitute and Crystal Meth dealer.
    It is beyond my comprehension, why you know-it-all, bible thumpers can’t seem to actually do anything substantial that actually helps all the forgotten children we currently have in our country.
    You are most likely a lonely middle-aged man, who has never married or fathered children of your own. So do Gay men like myself a big favor, run a bathtub of water, get in with your radio and electric hair dryer and put yourself out of misery! Unfortunately, you WON’T BE missed.

    • Ron Johnson Says:

      Ha, ha, you sick fuck faggot!! Faggot by genetics!
      Get the hell out of here before we laugh to death.
      Crystal meth dealer? Retired male prostitute?
      You are high-lari-us! You are a good damned faggot! Nothing more. Now go die of AIDS!!

  21. forex forum Says:

    Awesome issues here. I am very glad to look your post. Thanks a lot and I’m having
    a look forward to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

  22. Ron Johnson Says:

    The faggots are going to troll. They have these
    “Faggot Facts” that only they know about. Fags spread disease and lust after young boys. They’re not going to stop unless we exterminate them or lock them up. I prefer a permanent and “final solution” to Americas Faggot scourge.

  23. Oretha Cavender Says:

    How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 2 – Sexual abuse of children | Kenyans Against Homosexuality

    […]Perhaps plastic surgeons should screen for toxic fat and offer liposuction to prevent diabetes. #PlasticSurgery science20.com/news_articles/…[…]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: