The lesbian paradox

I’ve lately been musing about the lesbian lifestyle and all its attendant implications on women’s sexuality, and I’ve hit a profound realization. If lesbianism is a “naturally” occurring condition and not an acquired behaviour, why is it that lesbians experience menstrual flow just like other heterosexual women?

A lesbian couple on their "wedding" day. Do these women experience monthly menstrual flow and do they understand why this happens?

A lesbian couple on their “wedding” day. Do these women experience monthly menstrual flow and do they understand why this happens?

The answer to this seemingly innocuous question is quite revealing and I’ll illustrate this. The basic biological reason why women experience their monthly periods is to prepare their bodies for the possibility of a pregnancy. And since we know that a lesbian cannot become pregnant from having sex with another woman, why then should a woman who claims to have been born gay experience menstrual flow?

Let me put it another way so that my argument is clearer. If nature intended for the human race to have lesbians, then it doesn’t make any sense why nature would accord them a complete reproductive system similar to heterosexual women. Please note that this system regenerates itself every month in readiness for child bearing.

Come to think of it, for a woman to claim that she was born a lesbian, we would expect her not to have breasts, a vagina and a regular menstrual flow. These physical attributes are not just for aesthetic purposes but are essentially very functional – for the continuity of the human race through male and female sexual reproduction.

Let women who claim to be born as lesbians stop fooling themselves and the rest of us. This is a psychological problem that requires corrective therapy, not celebration.

I rest my case.

Tags: , ,

49 Responses to “The lesbian paradox”

  1. CommonSense Says:

    “why is it that lesbians experience menstrual flow just like other heterosexual women?”
    -Because both are women, lesbianism doesn’t affect menstrual flow are independent, etc.

    “The basic biological reason why women experience their monthly periods is to prepare their bodies for the possibility of a pregnancy.”
    -Not true, considering sterile women menstruate as well and they are not to blame. Also menstruation has lots of benefits:eliminates excess iron, which can be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, flushes bacteria out of the reproductive system, serving as a form of protection for STDs and infertility, includes two weeks where women demonstrate significantly reduced blood pressure. As a result, women have fewer heart attacks and strokes etc.

    “And since we know that a lesbian cannot become pregnant from having sex with another woman, why then should a woman who claims to have been born gay experience menstrual flow?”
    -Actually men and women procreate and raise families regardless of their sexuality. It’s happening around the world. By that logic, bisexual women should experience probably less menstruation flows. If you doubt lesbians were born that way, I wonder when they made the choice. Were they ever attracted to men, if you say so?

    If nature intended for the human race to have lesbians, then it doesn’t make any sense why nature would accord them a complete reproductive system similar to heterosexual women.
    -Yet you question nature for things that occur in it (even homosexuality). You wonder why lesbians are not different from straight women, or lack something. The answer is simple: they don’t.
    Example: just because someone is southpaw, that does not mean he should had been born with no right hand. nature does not work like that.

    “for a woman to claim that she was born a lesbian, we would expect her not to have breasts, a vagina and a regular menstrual flow.”
    -so you would expect her to be male or eunuch or something, but that is not the definition of “lesbian”. That does not make sense to me.

    “These physical attributes are not just for aesthetic purposes but are essentially very functional ” – True.
    “for the continuity of the human race through male and female sexual reproduction.”
    -The majority is straight, there are currently 7.2 billions worldwide, the UN’s warn that could reach 15.8 billions by 2100 etc. Though a homosexual minority does not raise concern about “human race continuity”, just imagine the chaos if from the very beginning (milleniums ago) till now, all people were straight.

    “Let women who claim to be born as lesbians stop fooling themselves and the rest of us. This is a psychological problem that requires corrective therapy, not celebration.”
    -Or give them a break and mind your own business! Their only problem is people who treat them like they are sick. If some of them have psychological problem, that is caused from the kinds of yours.
    Corrective therapy is a bad joke, since it’s been proved, long time ago, to simply not work. It moderates stereotypical behaviours (not sexual preferences), it cause psychological damage creating self-loathing, guilt and sexual dysfunction (which leads rather to miserable asexuality and suicide than to heterosexuality), it’s illegal, unethical and totally unapproved by APA.

    I hope you learned something. First, you don’t know a thing about lgbt’s. Second, love and acceptance of human diversity is a virtue, hate and rejection on the other hand are petty. Third, nice try making an argument against people not much different from anyone straight, but honestly as always, u make a case out of nowhere. Hope someday people even like u will realize that there is no solid argument against homosexuality and that the hatefull propaganda is actually coming from the ones in power who are supposed to love thy neighbour.
    Peace.

    • Addy Says:

      After reading your comments, I couldn’t add anything else.. you hit the nail on the head and we totally share the same sentiments.

    • Liz Says:

      Personally am NOT for gayism and Homosexuality sorry!

      But this person “Common Sense” is obviously very very smart and well read.They must have a very high I.Q .

      I mean i haven’t read such articulate and well answered comments on the net in a longggggg time! WOW!

      I would hate to argue with such a person.They are obviously very well composed but with very hard hitting points.Probably a doctor/lawyer or scientist! Very very smart character.

      People like that still exist? wow! am impressed!

      She/He read all the points on this blog,internalized them first and replied one-by-one basing it on research and obviously alot of knowledge in the subject! A very smart individual that. very smart

      • CommonSense Says:

        After reading all the articles in this website, and the outstanding weakness of many commenters to deliver any short of concrete data or a simple objective truth on the matter, i was about to give up thinking that the people who read that kind of published crap (except commenters like truthsay3r), are hopeless and incapable of love, honesty or even rational justification of this hatred.

        But then, i read your response and i thought: “There’s still hope out there”. I am amazed on the fact that there are people (like u) that can read a controversial subjects and still be able to notice there’s something falacious on this fight against that so-called “perversion” without letting their own prejudice and misinformation to blind their judgement.

        I can tell presumably from the first line of your response that you have a little prejudice as well, but also an unexpected understanding of the truth, that makes u capable of being objective on such a matter, regardless of what u’ve been told to believe. That being said, i think u have a brilliant mind.

        U r right about something: i’m higly educated. It’s a norm in my world. I am 22 years old, speak 3 languages fluently (english is not my mother tongue), close to gratuate from a greek technical university specialized as structural engineer and highly educated on many different subjects as well. Social sciences, different religions and psychology are few of my favourite specialties due to my keen interests. Just few things so u know that there is more wit in my little finger than there is in Blake’s entire body. And u could be surprised to know that i have lots of friends i kinda envy for their extraordinary education and potentials which impels me to keep improving myself everyday. I love intellectual debates but these homophobes in here are a waste of time.

      • CommonSense Says:

        As a kid, i was very religious and kinda homophobic too, but currently i’ve reached to a certain point where i can be entirely sure that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality and provide thorough justification on that. I’ve examined every possible argument people say against homosexuality and i can assure u they always fail in many different ways to have a solid point.

        U may have been told that in the western world where i i’m growing up people are immoral, corrupted, legalizing any short of abnormarlity or crime etc. My response to that: Until you hear both sides of a story, u either know half the truth or none of it. Seeing is believing and i’ve seen too many things that my perception on homosexuality has changed radically from what i’ve been taught ab initio. Just listen to the other side and make your own judgement. Learn to question everything u hear, even the things i say to u. Don’t take anything for granted.

        Keep in mind that this website is full of lies, misconceptions, made-up arguments, anachronistic propaganda, biased ancient researches that have been debunked long time ago by the very sciences they are supposed to rely on, the author is unable to tell a pedophile (or a rapist) from a homosexual. Whenever i question any of the nonsenses they say, they don’t have the desency to accept their fallacies or even prove me wrong for once striking any of my rebuttals and they use pedophilia as an excuse linking it falsely to homosexuality to rage people.

        Just keep in mind that whether u abuse a little boy or a little girl (matter of age), it’s wrong and irrelevant to being gay or straight (matter of gender). Incest, pedophilia, bestiality, rape: these are all crimes that cause actual harm that i can substantiate anytime. Au contraire, homosexual relationships are not much different from interacial relationships that cause no harm at all.

        I could keep talking on & on about how bad homophobia is and how evil this anti-gay movement actually is, but this is an extremely long matter. Feel free to ask anything u want.

        • Lesbian with her Associate's Degree Says:

          Thank you.
          Reading this thread in the comments has given me hope that if we remain calm &level-headed, people will see that we who happen to be LGBT are all just people.

        • Can I be Found? Says:

          I Cannot add more
          Well said

  2. CommonSense Says:

    One more thing: this site is full of bullshit. U people don’t case facts at all. Just hate, lies, misconceptions, slippery slope arguments and pure crap. I am not pro-gay, i am pro-human. U r not humanitarians but haters with no empathy for people u don’t know. I am sure you have never even discussed your perception with lgbt’s or get to know the truth by yourself. Shame on u.

  3. truthsay3r Says:

    Whether or not somebody is born homosexual is as irrelevant to the moral legitimacy of homosexuality as whether or not you are born with an innate desire to make an online blogg is to the moral legitimacy of you doing so.

    Nature doesn’t “intend” anything as it isn’t conscious. Your overall point in this thread is a non sequitur. Heterosexuality is neither necessary, nor sufficient for procreation & neither is heterosexual copulation, while homosexuality does not preclude it as a possibility.

  4. Georgina Adhiambo Says:

    Ur urgement does nt make sense, human sexuality is very diverse n we need to be open to learning, even a barren woman has all the qualities of a Women including the reproductive system and also a man in her life, bt still she can’t reproduce…. To the concerns abt a lesbian let’s all be open minded to knw more bt nt jst condemn

    • truthsay3r Says:

      My argument wasn’t a stand-alone argument, it was a refutation of other’s argument(s). Anyhow I agree with not condemning LGBT people, which is why I refute attempts to do so.

      Concerning your other points (not sure what you were getting at but):
      Many women don’t have men in their life, though they remain women. Whether or not a women has the qualities of a reproductive system in her life seems irrelevant to her moral legitimacy or that of her relationships.

  5. @comeagain Says:

    To the author: I really suggest you pick up a biology book next chance you get, so your ‘musings’ could at least stand a chance of being based on anything empirical and factual. Not even starting to mention the complete lack of logical thinking.

  6. Blake Says:

    Clearly, your love for the depraved homosexual lifestyle seems to directly affect your reasoning capacities and intelligent levels when challenged with rational arguments.

    Comparing a lesbian who has DELIBERATELY made a choice to lead a perverted lifestyle with a barren woman is so absurd it doesn’t even deserve a response.

    Isn’t it obvious that a barren or infertile woman in a normal, natural relationship with a man, who has been attempting to get a child and has not been successful is viewed as a tragic development in nature? Not only does she receive sympathy from many members of society, medical science attempts to help her as much as possible because everyone understands that what she is going through is not what nature intended!

    But I guess your homosexual lifestyles have perverted your thinking so much you refuse to see this obvious distinction. And by the way, do you all realise that an overwhelming majority of women who turn out barren almost always discover this unfortunate development ONLY when they are attempting to get a child?

    A lesbian on the other hand claims to have been born “naturally” never to relate sexually with a man but only with women! So why on earth would she need to have all the female biological functions that support pregnancy if she’s never going to have sex with a man???

    And just to educate your deliberately self-delluded minds….any high school child who has read some basic biology books can easily show you that pubescent girls and mature women indeed experience menstrual flow PRIMARILY to prepare their bodies for PREGNANCY! Any other benefit if any at all is extremely SECONDARY to that GOD-given design!

    The same high school kid will tell you that’s why monthly periods cease when a woman becomes pregnant!

    You have to be completely insane to split hairs on these simple biological FACTS.

    Poleni sana….and I hope that one day you’ll emerge from the bondage of homosexuality that has reduced your IQs to such pitiable levels 😦

    • CommonSense Says:

      “Clearly, your love for the depraved homosexual lifestyle seems to directly affect your reasoning capacities and intelligent levels when challenged with rational arguments.”
      -Clearly, u never cared to justify why u think homosexuality should be banned. This is not about whether homosexuality is ok or not. U will always loathe it no matter how irrelevant that is to whether it is right or not and u will always ignore that your very reasons to condemn homosexuality have no rationality at all.

      “Comparing a lesbian who has DELIBERATELY made a choice to lead a perverted lifestyle with a barren woman is so absurd it doesn’t even deserve a response.”
      – U r the one who described women that menstruate and do not procreate (whether lesbians or barren or …) as unnatural & wrong considering that menstruation is the very reason they are obligated by nature to procreate. The only thing i did is proving u say nonsences. The “perveted lifestyle” part is just your opinion and everyone is entitled to their opinion. FYI, being a lesbian is not a choice same way heterosexuality is not. Acting upon your sexuality as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone is the only way to be happy.

    • CommonSense Says:

      “Isn’t it obvious that a barren or infertile woman in a normal, natural relationship with a man, who has been attempting to get a child and has not been successful is viewed as a tragic development in nature?”
      -YES, IT IS. Same applies to natural lesbian or natural gay couples. But if there weren’t those kind of people (barren or gay), there would hardly exist any adoptions which are such kind (propably natural) actions.

      “what she is going through is not what nature intended!”
      – So nature has it’s own mind & conscience and makes mistakes. Or is it god that makes those mistakes? U don’t have the right to describe barren or lesbian women as “tragic developments” based on a stupid argument that all people (with no exception) are obligated by nature to procreate and people that choose no to have children are condemned. Do u think that tsunamis and hurricanes were pure mistakes of god or nature. GROW SOME BRAIN CELLS!

    • CommonSense Says:

      “But I guess your homosexual lifestyles have perverted your thinking so much you refuse to see this obvious distinction. And by the way, do you all realise that an overwhelming majority of women who turn out barren almost always discover this unfortunate development ONLY when they are attempting to get a child? ”
      -U r the one failing to think rationally. U still fail to explain why lesbianism is wrong and u take it a step forward trying also to imply that being barren is wrong cause u cannot have kids any other way (u must really hate adoptions), If u love children and want to be a good parent, u can always make that dream come true. By the way, there are many gay, lesbian or bisexual persons out there having biological kids not necessarily with their partner. U argument has no point about homosexuality.

    • CommonSense Says:

      “pubescent girls and mature women indeed experience menstrual flow PRIMARILY to prepare their bodies for PREGNANCY! Any other benefit if any at all is extremely SECONDARY to that GOD-given design!”
      -Even if we suppose that menstrual flow’s primarily reason is procreation (which fails to explain why it happens to barren women too, naive jerk), u fail to condemn homosexuality. Homosexuality doesn’t exclude procreation. Even if it did, we have the freedom to choose whether we are gonna procreate or not. Not everyone is obligated (or even suitable) to be a parent, therefore we shouldn’t condemn gays & lesbians on such logic.

    • CommonSense Says:

      “The same high school kid will tell you that’s why monthly periods cease when a woman becomes pregnant! ”
      – That doesn’t always happen, but anyway, that doesn’t get any close to prove homosexuality is wrong. Some women choose to procreate and some other don’t. Aren’t they allowed to? Some woman who choose to remain celibate has any obligation to procreate every once in a while to justify her menstrual flows? NO!

  7. CommonSense Says:

    “A lesbian on the other hand claims to have been born “naturally” never to relate sexually with a man but only with women! So why on earth would she need to have all the female biological functions that support pregnancy if she’s never going to have sex with a man???”
    -I explained it above but you didn’t bother to read. Summarily, women menstruate for many reasons apart procreation and the very existence of barren women that menstruate proves it. Also your argument is like: “why are we having two hands if we are using only one of them???”. The answer u r looking for is probably that nature didn’t want to differenciate lesbians from straight women and gave her an option but not an obligation to procreate. Do u understand that, idiot? Is it enough simple for u to get it?

    • Blake Says:

      Homosexuals and their supporters always turn to insults when they cannot refute biological or scientific facts. Even simple logic seems to escape them in their determination to justify the rightness of their perversions. The above incoherent rant devoid of any facts or medical research is a case in point.

      • CommonSense Says:

        RIGHT BACK AT U! I proved its one of your lies and fallacies, you completely ignored the utter weakness of your arguments against homosexuality and u still cannot accept that each 1 of your so-called arguments have no substance at all.

        “Homosexuals and their supporters always turn to insults when they cannot refute biological or scientific facts.”
        -Listen to the pot calling the kettle black! All the credible and unbiased biological & scientific facts prove how damn wrong all your prejudice is.

        “Even simple logic seems to escape them in their determination to justify the rightness of their perversions.”
        -Even simple logic seems to escape u in your determination to justify the rightness of your morals.
        Seeing homosexuality as a perversion is homophobia, irrational phobia of people attracted to the same sex (NOT TO CHILDREN and certainly not to such homophobes).

        “The above incoherent rant devoid of any facts or medical research is a case in point.”
        -U r the one ranting. And i don’t even need any sort of research to prove my simple logic against your crazy one. You stated that just because women menstrute, all of them are obligated to procreate and they also have to do it with men. My responce: They are allowed to do it (not obligated), and NOT ALL OF THEM (some of them are excluded by homosexuality, infertility or personal choise). It’s the same like “just because u have two hands, u don’t need to write with both of them” or “just because you menstrute, u r not obligated to procreate”
        By the way all the credible unbiased medical researches prove that homophobia is a medical condition and homosexuality is not.
        .
        As always homophobes have no rational arguments at all.
        NEXT TIME U DARE TO RESPOND, HAVE THE DECENCY TO SHOW ME EXACTLY WHICH OF MY POINTS IS WRONG, SAME AS I DO WITH ALL OF YOURS.

      • CommonSense Says:

        By the way, there was no insult in my statement as u implied, but i guess i’m asking too much by expecting from someone as arrogant and ignorant as u to actually care to read my comments and notice your own fallacies.
        Also your respond was completely out of context.

        • No Back sliding Says:

          You’re talking rubbish, fa88ot. Homosexuality is a dead end, with zero scientific evidence in favor of it. The rest is white western social engineering.

          • CommonSense Says:

            Just few evidence from wikipedia (in brief):

            ” Research indicates that many lesbians and gay men want, and succeed in having, committed and durable relationships. For example, survey data indicate that between 40% and 60% of gay men and between 45% and 80% of lesbians are currently involved in a romantic relationship.”

            “Studies have found same-sex and opposite-sex couples to be equivalent to each other in measures of satisfaction and commitment in relationships, that age and gender are more reliable than sexual orientation as a predictor of satisfaction and commitment to a relationship, and that people who are heterosexual or homosexual share comparable expectations and ideals with regard to romantic relationships.”

            “Scientific research has been generally consistent in showing that lesbian and gay parents are as fit and capable as heterosexual parents, and their children are as psychologically healthy and well-adjusted as children reared by heterosexual parents. According to scientific literature reviews, there is no evidence to the contrary. A review study suggested that the children with lesbian or gay parents appear less traditionally gender-typed and are more likely to be open to homoerotic relationships, partly due to genetic (80% of the children being raised by same-sex couples in US are their biological children) and family socialization processes (children grow up in relatively more tolerant school, neighborhood, and social contexts, which are less heterosexist), even though majority of children raised by same-sex couples identify as heterosexual.

            DOES THAT LOOK LOOK LIKE “ZERO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE”, U MORON? WHY IDIOTS LIKE U NEVER CHECK FIRST THE VALIDITY OF THEIR CLAIMS? DO U KNOW HOW EASY U MAKE IT TO ME TO DISPROVE U IN YOUR IGNORANCE?
            WHILE YOUR RESPONDS ARE JUST INSULTS & NOT SUBSTANTIATED, FALSE (AS I PROVED ABOVE)ALLEGATIONS, IT IS FUNNY ME THAT SO FAR, THOSE ARE PRETTY MUCH THE BEST U GOT.
            U TALK ABOUT “DEAD ENDS” AND UNICORNS, WHEREAS THERE ARE COUNTLESS PERSONS OR COUPLES HAVING EVERYTHING THEY NEED, REGARDLESS IF THEY ARE GAY OR STRAIGHT.

      • LipstickLesbian Says:

        http://www.yalescientific.org/2012/03/do-animals-exhibit-homosexuality/

        Also there are over 7 billion people on this Earth, which is why many natural resources, such as oil and land, are becoming exhausted and polluted to the point of exhaustion. The Earth, and the people living in it, would fare far better if many people, particularly the lesser-educated, stopped reproducing, and we allowed couples who want to adopt the children out there who need homes &loving families, regardless of the potential parents’ sexuality.

        • LipstickLesbian Says:

          Oops, typo: meant to say “exhausted any polluted to the point where the damage done could become irreversible”
          but I’m human and we all make mistakes, such as typing errors.

  8. Alison Says:

    Wow with amazingly intelligent comments like this I can see why Kenya is a world leader. Thank you for your enlightened words – I am now a changed woman! You surely are a wise “Mandingo” with your scientific approach to the study of lesbians.
    What next?
    Please answer the question – why do men have nipples?

    Idiot.

  9. Alison Says:

    By the way you do realise that quite a lot of lesbians do actually have children, they just don’t stay with the man.

    • LadyLover Says:

      Alot of lesbians don’t even get with a man to have kids, my wife and I utilized a sperm bank!

  10. Lady Says:

    You are single handedly the stupidest person in the world! Eat shit and die. P.s I’m straight and I still hate you.

    • No Back sliding Says:

      Get lost, filthy brainwashed white fa88ot loving slut. This blog is great, the haters are weak and emotional losers like you.

      • CommonSense Says:

        If u were not so ignorant and shallow, u would had noticed that in this entire website, there is no single homophobic argument stated either in the articles or in the comments boards, that hasn’t been analytically refuted (mostly by me).
        Just check my comments above that expose the weak and groundless homophobic reasoning (rant) and make a fool out of this article’s author and his unintelligent supporters. Feel free to call me whatever name u want. I don’t give a rat’s ass, considering how stupid u are (given that from your respond, one can easily tell what kind of person YOU are, no-one else).

      • Lesbifriends Says:

        Calling someone names on the internet, rather than refuting statements with credible sources and logical points of debate?

        Wow, you’re a badass.

        (&I feel this needs to be expressly stated: the above sentence was sarcasm.)

  11. Lady Says:

    You are single handedly the most stupid person on the planet. You need to go to school and get an education. You’re just a gay man in denial. Eat shit and die.

  12. ash Says:

    Your country is rotting and rotten… how could you say that kenya is a modern and democratic country after reading this? Is there a smart personn who really believe that kind of stupidity? Gay are not pedophile and you are fascists!! I’m living in your f#$*king country but not by my choice… I’m here to help people but when i read this i want to slap you all… Gays are people like everyonne else and you are stupid. I wish i will leave your racist and corrupted country soon… open minds are really rare here…

    • ash Says:

      It is not true… I love this country and people i met… I’m just really sad and angry about what this country is becomming…

      • LipstickLesbian Says:

        I hope for your sake that the Kenyan people, especially those holding office &other positions of power, open their minds to the basic facts of human diversity.

    • No Back sliding Says:

      You won’t be slapping anyone, you’ll get your dirty ass kicked to the curb. Dirty homosexual fanatics want to fight now? Bring it! You’re asking for genocide. Nothing open minded about the depraved homosexual “lifestyle,” just open asses. Eat sh1t and die, ash.

      • CommonSense Says:

        So that’s your great message-argument on homosexuality?? “NO OPEN ASSES! YES ON OPEN CUNTS!”. Why don’t u go then to “open” yourself too? Although u failed to give a filthy vulgar description on a lesbianism restriction too. What would that be btw, u idiot? “NO TITS SUCKING!”??
        Stupid on so many levels.
        We talk about rational rebuttals, human rights etc and all u think and talk about is buttholes, which is representative to your “intelligence”. One talks about people’s freedom to interacial marriage and another says: “NO BLACK COCKS IN WHITE CUNTS!”. Parallels anyone??? There u go! That’s your intellectual level, filthy trash!

        • LipstickLesbian Says:

          Agreed.
          Also anyone who feels they tell another what they should be doing sexually (besides a CONSENTING partner, or telling someone to back off someone else who is not consenting) has serious mental issues….

  13. Lesbian with her Associate's Degree Says:

    I have a period because I have ovaries and I eat enough to maintain a healthy bodyweight.
    There are women of varying sexual orientations (including straight women) who do not experience a period. This may be for many reasons: she may have been born without ovaries, she may have what doctors call a “lazy ovary” (and experience irregular periods and difficulty with conception), or she may be one of the unfortunately many women who suffers from an eating disorder.
    However, simply because a woman experiences a period, does not mean she should reproduce.
    I experienced my first period at 12 years of age; would you tell a 12 year old girl to become sexually active with men to try and conceive a child?
    I certainly would hope not!

    Also, your website lacks credible points of debate, ignores modern research, and operates under the pretense that humans are merely slaves to their bodies.

    It is insulting, offensive, and rather disconcerting to know that there are people in our modern world who actually think this way.

    I will be using this web address whenever I need to point out the short-sightedness of people who criticize homosexual people because we “aren’t natural”.
    Also, perhaps you could give this link a try: http://www.yalescientific.org/2012/03/do-animals-exhibit-homosexuality/

    Because I feel you (and all who actually believe a word you’ve written on this subject) should know that animals can be homosexual, too.

    Signed,
    Explain to me again how homophobia is natural & homosexuality is not?

    {Excuse my sarcastic signature, but I am unable to take this website seriously}.

  14. liberal Says:

    I can’t believe people discuss homosexuality, this is not sickness its not anyone’s business, unless they are dating you…and again its really not any business of anybody’s what happens under another’s pants whatsoever….I find this blog the most backward of blogs in Kenya and yet it has followers. How can someone in His right mind have the guts to stop thinking…..I mean aren’t there things to blog about….seriously!?! Or wait a minute, you are a christian, its only in the bible where homosexuality is a sin….Well Im an atheist but believe I know wring and right….and this being gay is not wrong….after all what makes you think being straight is right….just course you are many straight people right? And ahem did you read the play, ‘An Enemy of the people’? You’ll know what Dr. StockMann thinks of the majority….

  15. Jonathan William O'Toole Says:

    Contact me BLAKE! I’ll be in Kenya for three months. I sent you FB messages. Let’s meet soon.

  16. order flowers now Says:

    order flowers now

    The lesbian paradox | Kenyans Against Homosexuality

  17. wanjikukirichu Says:

    In my most arrogant opinion, this is definitely a not well researched article, sorry to disappoint. Homosexuality in women in seen to a result of nature or nurture, not necessarily the biological make up of a person. A lesbian is a woman who has sexual feelings for another woman and enjoys intimacy with them, it wouldn’t really make them lesbians if they did not experience menstrual flow, would it now? Because that is what normal women experience, regardless of their sexual orientation. There is also possibility of artificial insemination, so the menstruation comes in handy, you’re welcome 🙂

  18. Can I be Found? Says:

    This blogs is a classic example of misinformation due to bias and ignorance.

  19. YOUAREATOTALNUTCASE Says:

    let me just say that i never believed that being in the 21st century and the amount of knowledge we have acquired throughout life, that i would read such a narrow minded article, no wait, this whole blog is full of BS.. i mean really guy?? i personally hated biology in high school but i don’t remember(who was a staunch christian btw) saying anything like lesbians should not get their menstruation. i think you’re a narrow minded dyslexic who doesn’t really have any idea what he’s talking about. i get that you want to share your opinion, but make sure you give educated opinions and don’t just dive in head first into something you clearly know nothing about.. also you’re a discriminating prick and if i ever met you on the street(better hope not) i would totally spit on you.. i know I’m like 2 years late on this article but god you’re full of shit!!

Leave a reply to No Back sliding Cancel reply