Sodom – The movie that sharply exposes the west’s homosexual perversions

Here’s a most fascinating documentary that sharply exposes the moral rot and same-sex perversions being celebrated in western nations today. Just one more arsenal for Kenyans in their continued rejection of all things homosexual in our country.

Tags: , , ,

5 Responses to “Sodom – The movie that sharply exposes the west’s homosexual perversions”

  1. CommonSense Says:

    I watched this whole “documentary” expecting nothing else than an antigay propaganda film where the same bigoted assumptions are being made on & on, yet this one exceeds any expectation. This filth is as overmuch & fallacious as it can possibly get.

    I don’t even know where to start with this film which raises so many false allegations & arguments that have already been utterly destroyed in responds to the previous articles in this website. Let’s check some facts about this film:

    1) It’s producer, Arcady Mamontov, last year claimed that the meteorite explosion in Chelyabinsk was God’s punishment for gay activity in Russia.

    That makes one wonder why god would strike a Russian city when there are literally thousands of cities (let alone countries) worldwide of whom the majority of laws and population are in favor of the LGBT people & their rights, whereas Russia is severely hostile to LGBTs with antigay laws, its vast majority is against LGBT rights, LGBT Russians flee the country (Chelyabinsk included) seeking asylum in the USA and so on.

    There is no noteworthy gay activity or gay scene in this Russian city, compared even to other countries that criminalize being gay. That makes one wonder how he came to that conclusion.

  2. CommonSense Says:

    2)The misinterpretation of the sins of Sodom & Gomorra has been thoroughly examined and established before in this website before, but let’s give it another shot:

    I have provided you Biblical evidence from the Old Testament that clearly shows that the idea Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because of homosexuality is a fallacy and a lie that needs to be debunked. The 2 cities, according to the Bible, were destroyed by God for the following reasons :

    1.Arrogance, gluttony and being unconcerned about God (Ezekiel 16:48-50)

    2.Detestable or abominable acts which are religious rituals (Ezekiel 16:48-50)

    3.Being uncharitable towards strangers (Genesis 19)

    4.Hunger for power and rape (Judges 19:22)

    5.Turning away from God which is religious unfaithfulness (Amos 4 and Jeremiah 23:13-14)

    6.Being evil to the poor and not helping the needy (Amos 4)

    7.Living selfishly (Amos 4)

    In all of these scriptures above there is constant reference to Sodom and Gomorrah and there is no clear or direct link with homosexuality but rather a link with unrighteous people who have turned away from God. There is further Biblical evidence in the New Testament that supports the reasons listed above.

    Matthew 10:11-15″Whatever town or village you enter, search for some worthy person there and stay at his house until you leave. ….. If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town. I tell you the truth, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.”

    Here, Jesus Christ compares the sin of Sodom to the sin of faithlessness in people who reject the Gospel and inhospitality. The inhospitality links back to the story in Genesis where the men of Sodom & Gomorrah were being uncharitable towards the 2 strangers that were visiting in Lot’s home. Why would Jesus make a comparison with Sodom if Sodom & Gomorrah were exclusively about homosexual behavior? This is because homosexuality is not the issue here once again!

    “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them.”

    The Bible was originally written in Hebrew. In the above verse the Hebrew word for the verb “have relations” occurs 943 times in the Old Testament. Of them only 10 have sexual meaning, whereas the rest mean simply “to know”.

    These people threatened Lot. If he didn’t comply with their wishes they said they would do WORSE to him than to the two visitors. They were also trying to force the door down. They were obviously violent and they were trying to get at the unwilling guests. Sex + violence = RAPE, so even supposing that the angry mob had sexual intentions, since when gang rape proves anything about consensual adult relationships (be them either gay or straight)???

  3. CommonSense Says:

    3) In terms of Apostle Paul’s preaching, which is quoted in the film and destroyed as an antigay argument in my previous comments, whether he ever spoke against homosexuality or not, Paul was a Jew, former Christians persecutor who never heard or saw Jesus and a very misogynous man who preached that the right thing for a man is to NEVER touch a woman.

    He accepts though the morally inferior solution of monogamy to fight prostitution. He also demands that the widows remain celibate (as their husbands), but allows marriage even to them so they can handle their libidos. Summarily, marriage is presented by him as a necessary evil to restrain rampant sexuality. Yet Christians have no issue quoting him when it comes to gay couples.

  4. CommonSense Says:

    4)In reference to the Queen James Bible, though I understand its goal which is “to prevent homophobic interpretation of God’s word”, I personally consider this a waste of time, not because people are going to discredit its interpretation but because it seems like a lot of work to fix the relatively recent homophobic mistranslations to a book which is already corrupted anyway on so many levels and so many topics.

    I’m talking about the Bible here, a book that advocates for the barbaric conduct of slavery, commands human sacrifices to our Lord, condemns the interracial relationships, constantly demeans and oppresses womankind, demands us to kill the followers of other religions (Deuteronomy 13:7-12), discriminates against the handicapped and the castrated (Leviticus 21:16-23 & Deuteronomy 23:2), demands the death sentence for those working on the Sabbath (Exodus 31:12-15 & 35:2-3 etc.), necessitates circumcision, justifies and sanctifies genocides & mass murders including innocent children and infants, teaches that remarriage (after divorce) is adultery and adulterers should be put to death and so on & on.

    This book contains laws against:
    Shaving (Leviticus 19:27)
    Cursing (Ephesians 5:4)
    Gossip (Leviticus 19:16)
    Football on Saturday (Exodus 10:8)
    Eating Lobster or any Shell Fish (Leviticus 11:10)
    Eating Pork (Leviticus 11:7)
    Wearing Cotton and Polyester Blends (Leviticus 19:19)
    Associating with women who are having their periods (Leviticus 15:19-20)
    that the Church and everyday Christians reject along with false biblical assumptions that the Earth is flat, square & motionless while the sun goes around the world.

    The bible has indeed been mistranslated to condemn homosexuality and 1 proof of that among many others is the use of the word “homosexuals” in the Bible, whereas the term “homosexuality” as a sexual identity wasn’t coined or existed until 19th century and the word didn’t exist in any bible version until 1946. There are words in Greek for same-sex sexual activities, yet they never appear in the original text of the New Testament.

    Some argue about the translations of the words “arsenokoites” & “malakoi” (New Testament was originally written in Greek whereas O.T. in Hebrew). The exact meaning of the first word in ancient scriptures is unknown and its translation is troublesome. It’s absent from all Greek Christian sources and its absence from severely homophobic John Chrysostome proves that it cannot possibly relate to homosexuality. Similarly, Latin theologists of the first Christian centuries commenting on homosexuality never referred the “arsenokoites” passage.

    This word has been used by few ancient writers and by context it expresses some kind of economic exploitation, usually using sexual means: rape, sex (not necessarily gay) with economic motives, extortion, prostitution etc. It’s not circumstantial the fact that in texts with catalogues of sins, “arsenokoitia” is enlisted in economic and NOT sexual crimes.

    It should be noted that during Martin Luther King’s era, the term meant “masturbation”. In other times it was used for pedophiles but those can be heterosexuals too (yes, sexual abuse of little girls is also pedophilia, don’t dodge this).

    For the word “malakos”, interpretation is easier as there is much more use of this term in ancient Greek texts. Xenophon uses this term for “lazy” or “idle”, Epiktetus for those that prefer an easy life and avoid the difficulties of philosophy. Plutarch & Josephus Flavius & Cassius Dio (all 3 lived at the time Paul’s passage was written) use this term for “coward”. Summarily, in ancient literature “malakoi” are the men living in wealth & luxuries, having depraved lives. There was never any sexual meaning (gay or not) in this term.

    Given that, I see no reason for not reexamining & establishing the accurate translation of words and passages that have no homophobic elements whatsoever (above examples included).
    Again, given the depravities and absurd laws of the Bible itself, I wonder why we should care at all. It’s not like we have to use the Bible to examine whether interracial marriage is moral or not, right? The Bible is severely flawed to be followed to the letter anyway.

    I’d like to state that the Resurrection of Jesus in Mark’s and John’s gospels has been recognized by the Church herself to be forged, but She (the Church) accepts those forgeries anyway because the Resurrection is the sine qua non of the Christian faith and as Paul said in 1 Corinthians 5:17, “If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless.”

  5. CommonSense Says:

    5)Scott Lively, who appears in the film, is a Christian fundamentalist who pretends to be a historian, blaming gays for nearly everything from communism, Islam, terrorism, natural disasters, and the price of Saudi Oil.

    He co-authored, with Kevin Abrams, the book “The Pink Swastika”, in which Lively claims that gays are responsible for establishing the Nazi Party. Multiple professional historians have found large numbers of historical inaccuracies in the book. Sadly, many people detached from reality, wanting gays to look as bad as possible, have bought into it. Lively is also keen to rewrite reality as needed – if called on the fact that 15,000 gays were killed in the Holocaust, Lively will argue that the Nazis in power were butch homosexuals seeking to purge the “femmes” from the population.

    This is one of Lively’s more popular debate tactics – any hate crimes against homosexuals were either faked, examples of “gay-on-gay violence,” or exaggerated so that the victim incited a violence response that was nonetheless exaggerated by the media. Seems like this freak has no idea how many teens have killed themselves because of bigots like him or how many countries would still imprison someone just for being gay.

    In the film, he conducts scaremongering tactics tricking the audience into believing that the rising global acceptance of LGBTs in various societies and governments will lead someday in a new reverse-racist world where heterosexuals will be the new victims, LGBTs will turn from victims to persecutors, straight people will be oppressed to tolerate gays no matter how religious-racists they are and forced to celebrate and practice homosexuality whereas heterosexuality will be considered outdated & unacceptable. WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP!

    Lively has claimed that Obama, despite having a wife and 2 daughters, is secretly gay because he… went on a trip with a male aide but without his wife. In Lively’s mind, 2 men travelling together can only mean 1 thing: constant, gay butt-sex, obviously. Lively is being sued in a Massachusetts court for “crimes against humanity” by an organization named “Sexual Minorities of Uganda” due to his hand in the infamous Ugandan ‘Kill The Gays’ bill.

    This guy has obviously a thing for homophobic ranting: he says that the average American is against homosexuals & gay marriage(statistics & polls say otherwise) but are afraid to say so because the gays have so much power that can persecute them for simply disagreeing with their “lifestyle”. WHAT??? How can anyone be stupid enough to believe that people voting against gay marriage in any country are suffering any kind of prosecution for doing so???

    I don’t know if it’s even necessary to go on with exposing the rest of the lies, the manipulated images and every shred of anti-gay propaganda in this filthy film once again. Though there are far a lot more to expose and debunk about this “documentary”, aren’t the above statements enough to clarify how severely depraved those filmmakers are?

    Personally, this whole film failed to give me the slightest antigay insight or valid argument whatsoever. I challenge anyone to examine my statements (Blake so far has been too much of a coward to face and confront my arguments, dodging pretty much most of my comments) or ask me to destroy any specific homophobic argument u are still somehow able to consider valid in your ignorance, yet u falsely believe I cannot thoroughly disprove it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: