Posts Tagged ‘homosexuality and society’

How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 3 – Increased immorality

June 23, 2012
Image

On May 10, 2012 – the day after Barack Obama announced that he supported same-sex “marriage,” St. Francis Xavier Catholic Church in Acushnet, Massachusetts (USA) countered with its own message. Almost immediately the church received hateful phone calls and Facebook page posts. Is that the wonderful “tolerance” for divergent opinions homo lobbies are always preaching about?

American President Barack Obama announced on 9th May, 2012 that his views on homosexuality have “evolved” to the point where he now supports same-sex “marriages”. This must really stand out as one of the most brazen lies ever uttered by the man. The truth is, Obama has always been an ardent supporter of so-called homosexual rights in America since the 1990s.

He did try to hide the fact during the 2008 elections. Tragically, his rival in that year’s presidential campaign Senator John McCain woefully failed to call his bluff on the subject. In my opinion, this was deliberate on McCain’s part to give Obama an easier pass into the presidency as part of an elaborate charade that passes for democracy in that country. Mitt Romney will likely do the same thing this year.

Nonetheless, the recent “coming out” by Obama sets the stage for us to examine a fundamental question the cultural wars in America are grappling with today – whether homosexuality is in fact a destructive and immoral behaviour as thousands of past generations have rightly believed, or whether it is after all a human “right” beyond the moral question as advocated by supporters of homosexuality. This is the last of my three-part series demonstrating how homosexuality destroys society.

Morality is largely defined as principles concerning the distinction between wrong or right behaviour among human beings. In that context, it’s pretty easy to conclude that homosexual behaviour is actually a wrong sexual behaviour because of the following three simple reasons:

1. It’s biologically unhealthy:

This is due to a raging epidemic of diseases documented by credible medical research, higher suicide rates, higher rates of child sexual molestation and insanely high rates of sexual promiscuity – these statistics show that for every one woman a heterosexual man has had sex with in his lifetime, the average homosexual man has engaged in sodomy with nearly 50 male partners. Yes, you read that right – fifty men or boys! Because of this deadly lifestyle (a “deathstyle” actually), homosexuals have an overall diminished life expectancy of up to 20 years on average compared to heterosexuals.

2. It’s biologically unnatural:

This is rather obvious from our genital make-up. When it comes to same-sex relations, the parts simply don’t fit and that’s why it is regarded as abnormal. For those liberal minded fellows who have a problem with the word “normal”, here’s a working definition – “that which works according to design”.

Sex between a man and a woman is an act according to nature (natural). More appropriately – its how God designed human beings to enjoy  themselves as couples and procreate their own kind. Anything else is really a distortion or a perversion of that fact. When this fundamental truth is ignored, the catastrophic results are what we see in (1) above. Homosexuality accomplishes nothing in nature other than fulfill some perverted sexual lust.

3. Because God (the Creator of the universe and everything in it) declared it so:

This is in answer to those people who want to ask: “Says who?”

If you are not theistic in your worldview, I truly understand if the third point triggers all the secular alarm bells in you. Like it or not, accept it or reject it, this statement is in fact the best and most reliable moral grounding for any human behaviour. Allow me to explain.

The moral foundation of human societies

History has continuously demonstrated that when you remove God (the objective moral law-giver) from human societies, you are left with unreliable human opinions that are subjective, whimsical and ever changing to accommodate the latest popular fad or desire. You are left with no objective and authoritative standard to judge human behaviour and the results are always catastrophic.

To understand what I mean, take the following statements by Prof J. Budziszewski in his book “What We Can’t Not Know: A Guide”.

“The whole meaning of morality is a rule that we ought to obey whether we like it or not. If so, then the idea of creating a morality we like better is incoherent. Moreover, it would seem that until we had created our new morality, we would have no standard by which to criticize God. Since we have not yet created one, the standard by which we judge Him must be the very standard that He gave us. If it is good enough to judge Him by, then why do we need a new one?”

Without a moral system whose foundation is our Creator God, we’ve got nothing. No one would be in any position to condemn anything any human being does, because…er…um….that would just be your opinion. That’s exactly what Hitler would tell us if we condemned him for killing 6 million jews! The reality of our human lives is that we inherently live out our lives relying on an objective moral code far above our subjective human opinions. And this code is innate, placed there by God whether one acknowledges His existence or not. This code (our conscience) is what empowers us to say that the holocaust was objectively wrong, even if the Nazis had won the 2nd world war and somehow convinced the world that exterminating all Jews was the right thing to do!

The destructive consequences of human immorality

The following enlightened perspective on human immorality is quite revealing regarding the instincts that inform support for homosexuality in the West:

“Immorality affects our ability to reason properly regarding moral and spiritual matters. We begin to reason in ways that supports what we want to be true, rather than what we know to be true. For example, to avoid the conviction of our conscience when engaging in immorality, we first attempt to justify/rationalize our behavior as an exception to the moral law. Eventually, however, we find it easier to deny the moral law-giver Himself.  If there is no moral law-giver, there is no moral law; and if there is no moral law, then we are not moral law-breakers, so the guilt we feel for doing X can be safely ignored, suppressed, or explained away. Such reasoning leads to self-deception, and ultimately deadens one’s awareness of God.”Source.

This is the tragedy faced by secular western nations today. They have denied the moral law-giver so that they can comfortably embrace homosexuality. The destructive consequences of this decision are now thriving in the west. They have quickly forgotten that one of the critical historical explanations for the collapse of the once mighty Roman empire was due to the absurd normalisation of homosexuality among its nobility.

On the other hand, Kenya’s new constitution has a preamble that acknowledges God as the supreme guiding authority in our affairs as a nation. So inevitably, God and His opinion will feature prominently in moral questions that affect the way we live and govern ourselves as Kenyans. This is the philosophy that informed the decision to retain the penal code sections 162-165 that criminalize homosexual behaviour in the country.

I’ve always wondered, if Barack Obama and his UK counterpart David Cameron are so keen on promoting homosexuality, why not support all other forms of sexual orientations such as bestiality or necrophilia as well? Otherwise one would posit that they are discriminating against other human beings who want to publicly celebrate their “animal love” through marriage to their dogs, cows, horses or whatever animal they sexually engage with. Why is this any different from homosexuality?

If you legitimise homosexuality in the name of “diversity” and “human rights”, you simply cannot afford to discriminate against all other types of sexual orientations. Science tells us that there are over 20 documented sexual orientations including some that would make you vomit uncontrollably. I submit that Obama and his friends would have no grounds to reject their demands for “equality” and even celebration. That is the only logical destination for all people who support the legitimisation of homosexuality in society. All other sexual behaviours deemed to be perversions would naturally have to be accommodated as legitimate identities under the homosexual clarion call for “tolerance”, “diversity”, “pride” and “human rights”.

How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 2 – Sexual abuse of children

March 18, 2012

A poster by the homosexual group North American Men/Boy Lovers Association (NAMBLA) celebrating the sexual molestation of young boys.

Today I continue to shine an unrelenting spotlight on the destructive homosexual lifestyle that American President Barrack Obama and UK’s Prime Minister David Cameron are determined to foist on the rest of the world. To most right-thinking human beings, no other form of child abuse is as revolting and devastating as the sexual molestation of children. In this second series on how homosexuality destroys human societies, I’m going to unapologetically expose the strong linkages between the practice of homosexuality and the sexual violation of children.

The rampant sexual abuse of young boys has over the years remained a defining characteristic of the homosexual lifestyle’s horrific mode of recruitment. Despite objections by homosexual lobbies and their sympathizers, credible research continues to show that very often a majority of homosexuals had their own initial same-sex encounter with an adult while children.

A review on a research conducted on the molestation of boys (Holmes and Slap, 1998), and published in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), showed that adolescent boys who were sexually abused by men were up to 7 times more likely to identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual later in life. A study by Freund & Watson (1992), which was reported in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, found that “homosexual males were three times more likely than straight men to engage in adult-child sexual relations.”

According to a 2002 study by Steve Baldwin – Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement – pedophilia occurs far more commonly among homosexuals than among heterosexuals on a per capita basis. “It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh,” wrote Baldwin. “However, it is time to acknowledge that homosexual behavior threatens the foundation of Western civilization – the nuclear family.” The Family Research Council of America supports these findings through the key concept of proportionality in understanding the repugnant phenomena by offering some empirical evidence here.

In addition, Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover says in his book Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, that there is a “substantial, influential, and growing segment of the homosexual community that neither hides nor condemns pedophilia.” The North American Men/Boy Lovers Association (NAMBLA) is a classic example. There was once a lesbian version going by the name “Butterfly Kisses” based in the Netherlands.

Not surprisingly, several prominent homosexuals have agreed with these findings. Writing in a May 1992 publication of The Advocate, a homosexual known as Carl Maves frankly confessed: “How many gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable, liberating experience – one that initiated them into their sexuality – if it weren’t for this so-called molestation?” The Advocate (established in 1967) is the oldest continuing homosexual magazine in the United States.

Kevin Bishop, an admitted pederast (pedophile), has been promoting the work of NAMBLA in South Africa. Bishop, who was molested at the age of six, is also an admitted homosexual who is blunt about the relationship between homosexuality and pedophilia. “Scratch the average homosexual and you will find a pedophile,” said Bishop in an interview with the Electronic Mail & Guardian (June 30, 1997). According to a 2005 essay by Brian Clowes, PhD., and David Sonnier – Child Molestation by homosexuals and heterosexualsthis candid revelation is shared by homosexual leaders who admit a natural link between their lifestyle and child sexual abuse. Its no wonder Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the top adviser to the Pope, blamed homosexuality not celibacy for the rampant sexual abuse of young boys in the Catholic Church through a widely reported statement to the media.

Abolishing legal barriers to sex with children 

Despite gay activists denial that they want easy access to boys, homosexual groups in the west have over the last decade lobbied hard to not only lower the age of sexual consent laws in their countries, but to abolish them altogether if possible. This has been the tragic reality in secular western nations that continue to affirm so-called “gay rights” with dangerous consequences on the safety of their own children. Believe it or not, a pedophile political party in the Netherlands has aggressively been campaigning for the sexual age of consent to be lowered from 16 to 12 years for boys. The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party was launched in 2006 to also push for the legalization of child pornography and sex with animals.

In England, a major campaign is underway to lower the age of sexual consent for homosexuals from 16 to 14. The homosexual organization OutRage! has been leading the crusade. In a statement published on the Queer Intelligence Service website, OutRage! claimed that “under-age queers have rights too. They are some of the most vulnerable members of our community. We have a special responsibility to protect their interests and welfare.”

In America, homosexuals have brazenly attempted to gain unfettered access into the Boy Scouts movement of America (BSA). In 2000, a lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of New Jersey to compel the BSA to accept homosexual scout masters (BSA et al. v. Dale). BSA asserted that “homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the values embodied in the Scout Oath and Law, particularly those represented by the terms “morally straight” and “clean,” and that the organization does not want to promote homosexual conduct as a legitimate form of behavior.” The court ruled in BSA’s favour declaring that their constitutional right to freedom of association gave them authority to expel a gay assistant Scoutmaster, James Dale.

To appease homosexual activists, Philadelphia City officials amazingly began searching for a way to punish the scouts for this ruling. On May 31, 2007 the City Council voted 16-1 to break a 79-year-old agreement allowing the Cradle of Liberty Council of the Boy Scouts to occupy a building in a city park. The Scouts built the building in 1928, and turned it over to the city in exchange for a rent-free lease “in perpetuity.” Apparently, “perpetuity” in Philadelphia now meant, “until gay groups boot you out.” The Scouts could stay only if they opened their ranks to open homosexuals. The Scouts filed a lawsuit in May 2008 claiming their civil rights were being violated. Once again they prevailed and the city was compelled to return the building to the Scouts.

Away from these despicable legal efforts to normalize sex with children, some homosexual activists have promoted the idea that keeping children from sexual activity is actually a form of child abuse. In fact, one homosexual magazine once hailed pedophiles as prophets of sexual freedom! An editorial in the July 1995 issue of Guide magazine declared:

Kids are still being taught destructive lies about sex. They are told that until they are 16 (or 14 or some other arbitrary age that varies from state to state) … any sexual expression on their part means a crime is being committed. We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual, that they deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose. … We cannot, however, always be proud of the way we as a community have treated our prophets. … We must listen to our prophets. Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality…” (Source – York F.V., Knight R.H (1998). Homosexual Behavior & Pedophilia, pp 4).

Granted that our local media continues to highlight the tragedy of child sexual molestations by heterosexuals, more worrying also is the growing phenomenon of young boys being sodomised in various parts of the country. It’s likely that a more assertive homosexual movement encouraged by a friendlier judiciary led by their biggest ally – Chief Justice Willy Mutunga – is fueling these despicable activities. From the well-attested research findings shared above, I submit that legitimization of the homosexual lifestyle would dramatically increase the sexual abuse of young Kenyan children to unimaginable levels. Our children deserve to be protected from all attempts to legitimize homosexuality in the country by western-funded gay organizations.

How homosexuality destroys society and families: Part 1

December 17, 2011

David Kuria Mbote, a prominent campaigner for the legitimisation of the destructive homosexual lifestyle in Kenya. He is running for the Kiambu County senate seat in the 2012 general elections with the singular agenda to legislate same-sex marriage in Kiambu County and possibly the whole country.

In a misguided sense of sympathy or in a pathetic attempt to support the legitimization of homosexuality in society, one of the most frequently asked questions goes like this: How does homosexuality affect society? Or how does same-sex marriage affect your marriage or family as a heterosexual?

Well, today I’m delighted to start tackling these questions comprehensively and put to rest all doubts regarding the grave dangers posed to our society by the ongoing covert attempts to legalise homosexual relations in Kenya. This is the first of a series of posts on this subject.

Lets begin by looking at the severe repercussions of the homosexual lifestyle on the physiological wellbeing of society. As numerously attested on this blog and validated by decades of medical research, all sorts of sexually transmitted diseases and other forms of malignant cancers and psychiatric disorders increase dramatically in societies where homosexuality is allowed to thrive (See previous posts on these afflictions). The AIDS pandemic is a classic example of a disease that originated with homosexuals and continues to thrive among men who have sex with other men (MSM). Its prevalence remains disproportionately much higher in homosexuals compared to heterosexuals.

In the United States of America for example, medical data has identified homosexual activity among males as by far, the largest single source of HIV infection in the general population. In a dramatic admission in early 2009, homosexual activist Matt Foreman, executive director of the United States National Gay and Lesbian Task Force shocked fellow homosexuals by declaring, “HIV is a gay disease.

While addressing the National Conference on Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender Equality in Detroit, Michigan, Foremen stunned the assembly by stating: “With 70 percent of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi-sexual, we cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that.”

Here in Kenya, the prevalence of HIV/AIDS among Homosexuals is not any different from the sorry figures in America. The former General Manager of the Gay & Lesbian Coalition of Kenya (GALCK) David Kuria Mbote is on record admitting the same in 2009 on the GALCK website. He noted that “the few studies done on MSM activity in the country point at very grave seroprevalence levels among the MSM, typically a group that would also include gay men in Kenya. The Kilifi study points at 43%.”

He candidly went further to share: “Latest data from National Aids Control Council points out that 15% of all new HIV infections in the country are MSM related. For a population that is typically very small (perhaps less than 5%), these figures should be worrisome.” In another interview, he stated again:” Some statistics give you 47 per cent prevalence among the MSM and in some sexual networks the prevalence is much higher.”

Many of these closeted MSM also sleep with women, thereby spreading the disease to the rest of society. Now, if the facts starkly tell us that homosexuality endangers societal health, why are we being forced to legitimize the unnatural practice by President Obama and UK’s David Cameron and their hired puppets such as David Kuria in Kenya?

Kenyans should take note here that this David Kuria quit his position in GALCK in order to launch a political campaign for Senator of Kiambu County. Its instructive that the man has already failed the first test of integrity by not proclaiming on his website that he is a proud homosexual and that he has been advocating for the legitimization of homosexuality in the country for many years. Kiambu voters certainly need to know this.

However, I believe his misguided political campaign was just set-up to hoodwink white foreign donors obsessed with the promotion of homosexuality around the world. The guy will certainly not stand a chance but he is likely to make lots of money from European and American donors. In fact I believe it’s a cheap way to obtain political asylum in America or some European country once he starts claiming that his life is in danger – presumably from “homophobic” Kenyans.

Interestingly, the fellow wrote me an email earlier this year where he boasted that his one and only intention of becoming Kiambu Senator is to have same-sex marriages in the county legalised. Kiambu voters and residents, you’ve been warned. See my email correspondence with him below:

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:28 PM, David Kuria wrote:

Dear Intolerant,

Create your blog and say all the stuff you want, but you are on the wrong side of history.

Yes I am not at GALCK anymore, but that is because I have set up a strong foundation for the repeal of section 162 – 165 of the penal code.

Just so you know, I will be the Senator for Kiambu County, where my one and only intention is to have same-sex marriages in the county – which is possibly the most liberal in Kenya.

Check out my absolutely fantastic website – http://www.kuriaforsenator.com – again, sorry for you.

Kind regards
Senator David Kuria.
Kiambu County.

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Blake Onyango wrote:

Dear Kuria,

This is a pleasant surprise, hearing from you!

First of all, allow me to offer my greatest sympathies for your depraved condition and ugly sexual compulsions. Its a tragedy that instead of seeking readily available help to be freed from your sexual predicament, you’ve opted instead to propagate your perverted lifestyle onto other Kenyans.

Just two questions for you:

Do the people of Kiambu, whom you claim you want to lead as a Senator, realise that you are a proud Homosexual? Remember as a “liberal leader”, you need not feel any shame in openly declaring who you are and what you stand for.

Are you willing to appear publicly in a TV talk show to debate on the benefits, if any, that will accrue for Kenya if we legitimise and celebrate such a repugnant and dangerous lifestyle?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

BLAKE

PS: To date, the cowardly stooge (on hire by western homosexual organisations) has not responded or taken up my challenge.

===================================

For a complete listing of numerous sexually transmitted diseases that afflict both male and female homosexuals, visit this webpage.