Posts Tagged ‘homosexuality’

Ex-gay man: ‘Homosexuality is just another human brokenness’

February 4, 2017
Featured Image
Looking back on his past, Bailey says he now sees that he has been brought out of what he calls the “sexual confusion of homosexual behaviors” to a sexual clarity in mind and heart.

By Pete Baklinski

Dean Bailey, 50, is not afraid to tell anyone he is living proof that ‘sexual orientation’ can in fact be changed. But he prefers to use the word ‘restored’ rather than ‘changed.’

Bailey remembers how from an early age he felt different from other boys. He felt he did not fit in and thought of himself as awkward, out of place. He remembers never feeling treasured or affirmed by his dad who was an alcoholic and who consumed pornography. Bailey believes this began a pattern of turning to other males to find the affirmation he never received from his dad.

When a new outgoing boy began to attend school when Bailey was in grade three, he remembers trying hard to become the boy’s friend. It was during a sleepover at the boy’s house that Bailey was introduced to sexual play, including streaking and oral copulation. The experience not only robbed him of his childhood innocence, but awakened in him a sense of sexual curiosity.

From here, Bailey became preoccupied with images of male nudity and with taking more daring sexual risks with different boys. As he grew older, the sexual acts Bailey performed with other boys became as a source of comfort to him, making him believe he was being loved and accepted. But while such acts would make him feel good for a while, he says they were never able to help him overcome the constant theme of emptiness and brokenness he felt inside. The sexual activities quickly became addictive.

When a schoolgirl refused to go on a date with him that seemed to signal to the now-teenage Bailey that he was not a normal guy. Then, a few years later, a sexually awkward one-night stand with a woman seemed to confirm to him that he did not have what it took to be a man.

ImageDean Bailey as a young man in the military.

Bailey was now a young man in the military. Although in the meantime he had gotten married, he continued to crave male intimacy and experience gripping same-sex attractions. An intimate but non-sexual encounter with a military male friend whom he greatly admired eventually led to explicit homosexual behaviors.

The encounter severely damaged the relationship Bailey had previously enjoyed with his wife as she felt she could no longer trust the man she had married.

Having experienced homosexual acts, Bailey now struggled inwardly with intense homosexual desires that could only be allayed through carnal gratification, or so it seemed to him. Feelings of insecurity only intensified these inclinations.

His previous homosexual experiences drove him to seek answers to his insecurities through further homosexual encounters. A downwards spiral ensued as Bailey attempted to satisfy his desires, but only saw them grow in intensity the more he indulged them. Looking back, Bailey now realizes how homosexual acts had become an addiction for him.

Bailey credits God for acting powerfully in his life to save him from himself, change his life for the good, and ultimately bring about his deliverance from homosexual attractions. God led him on a journey of trust that ultimately led to the heart of Jesus Christ. Here Bailey experienced the love, acceptance, and affirmation he had always craved.

To put it simply, says Bailey, he fell in love with the person of Jesus. He experienced Him through prayer and through reading the Bible. All Bailey wanted now was to become more like Jesus, more Christ-like. As he began acting more and more on this desire, Bailey noticed a transformation begin to take place in his sexual desires. The homosexual desires began to decrease. For the first time in his life, Bailey began to see himself differently, this time through the eyes of a Savior who — he now realized — loved him unconditionally.

Looking back on his past, Bailey says he now sees that he has been brought out of what he calls the “sexual confusion of homosexual behaviors” to a sexual clarity in mind and heart. He has left behind what he calls the “self-defeating environment of my own, very negative self-image” and moved into an unshakable understanding of his value and self worth as a beloved child of God.

Image
Dean Bailey with his wife Della and daughters Amber and Amanda.

Bailey wrote about his entire journey in his 2011 book titled “Beyond the Shades of Gray.” Most of the book is available online at his website. He speaks publicly about his struggle with homosexuality, telling audiences that homosexuality is a “sexual addiction and dependency,” not a condition to be socially accepted and celebrated. “It is merely one of the many evidences of the broken, spiritual condition of our human race,” he tells people.

In an interview with LifeSiteNews from Texas where he lives with his wife Della and his two college-aged daughters, Amber and Amanda, Bailey spoke about what he has gained by leaving behind the homosexual identity, the role of God in bringing about sexual healing, about his views on the Christian understanding of homosexuality, and about why stories like his are shunned by the mainstream.

The following interview has been condensed.

LifeSiteNews: What happens to someone when they abandon a gay identity? Is the pain, the loss of friendships, and the total switching of inner gears worth it?

Bailey: When a person abandons their inward belief that it was homosexual behaviors that define them as a person, then they must set out to rediscover what it is that actually does define their personhood. They must learn to embrace and give those higher human ideals a greater value and meaning within their own character and existence, than they gave to the homosexual addictions which they allowed to dominate their thinking and reasoning in the past.

Is it all worth it? I would answer with an emphatic “Yes, of course it is!” But not everyone will agree with me.

Gay activists, for example, vehemently insist that this journey I’ve taken is harmful. They have even managed to get bills passed in California and New Jersey which outlaw counseling for persons desiring help toward becoming free from their homosexual behaviors and addictions.

I freely admit that this freedom I’ve found is a journey that could very well involve a lifetime, rather than a simple transition of just a few short years. “We didn’t end up in this mess overnight, and we shouldn’t expect to remove ourselves from it overnight, either,” I will often tell people.

I also acknowledge that this journey will cause some inward conflict, pain and emotional discomfort at times, even when it is chosen as a path. But I do believe that sexual restoration is ultimately a very healthy choice in the end, and not a harmful one. Nothing of extraordinary value is ever going to be easy to achieve, after all. So it is on purpose that I call this journey a “restoration” rather than a change or a conversion.

There is no way to fully comprehend or predict the personal cost, effort and sacrifice involved for any individual, until that person embarks upon this journey by personal choice, by his or her own free will. Society should not be expected to make any accommodations for those who therefore refuse to take this journey, and remain trapped in the self-serving cycle of their own dysfunctional sexual behaviors. Nor should responsible parents be denied the lawful ability to seek out the professional help that their children may desperately need and desire. The reality of this entire issue is that homosexuality is a harmful behavior pattern, and not a human identity or a human “right.”

People often wonder why would the gay activists be trying to outlaw professional means of therapy and counseling for the pursuit of freedom from unwanted homosexual behaviors, if they truly embrace the “tolerance” that they preach? What is it that they are actually so afraid of? I will tell you that what they fear the most is the breakdown and destruction of the inward lies that form the foundation of their own “gay” identity, and everything that the “gay rights” movement has been built upon. That is why gay activists will always insist that this form of dysfunctional sexual behavior is “who” they are. It is the only way for them to remain secure in the falsehood.

LifeSiteNews: What does someone who leaves the gay lifestyle have to look forward to in the years to come? What have you gained the most?

Bailey: I see myself differently. I see other people differently. And I see the world around me quite differently. That doesn’t mean that everything in my life is now blissful and stress-free. And it doesn’t mean that I don’t still feel the human pangs of loneliness and depression on occasion.

But I see my insecurities as identifiable weaknesses that can all be understood and overcome with time, in light of my own proper acknowledgement and truthful recognition of my individual human weaknesses. I now understand that homosexual behavior is not the legitimate answer for the pain that I may still feel inside of myself during rough or low times.

Every human being goes through challenges and pain. But the homosexual ideology seems to reason that this particular challenge makes a person different from everyone else in some way, in much the same way that a person diagnosed with bipolar disorder will often see the world around them as the real problem — rather than themselves — and choose to stop taking their prescribed medication because of that false and distorted reasoning. That is where this whole “gay identity” thought process evolved from.

LifeSiteNews: Your journey seems inherently linked to discovering the person of Jesus Christ in Christianity. People in the culture will tend to write you off as a Christian nutcase because of this. What role has Jesus played in your journey away from same-sex attraction? Do you think Jesus has a role to play in the life of anyone seeking to leave the gay identity behind?

Bailey: Most people assume that, because I do support counseling and professional “conversion therapy” as avenues to consider within this journey, I myself have been through some sort of therapy. But that is not the case. Jesus Christ was my counsellor in every aspect of my own journey. After all, he is referred to as “Wonderful Counselor” in the biblical writings that tell us about him.

God desires to have a personal relationship with me — with each of us — and to become involved in every intricate detail of our lives, in our daily walk and fellowship with him. Christianity is a way of life that reveals God as a loving Father who deeply cares about all that we do as his children in this earth.

I credit Jesus with lifting my spirits during the low points of my journey, and with sustaining me through the high points of it. I credit him with sending the right people into my life at just the right time, so that they could love and support me along the way. I credit him with leading me to the right places when I had inward questions and confusion that I could not overcome with just the faith of a simple “Christian” prayer – and, by the way, I do believe that Jesus wants to know our deepest questions.

The fact is that I don’t know that I could have made such a journey without Jesus walking beside me through it. And I am still on that lifelong journey with him, in spite of what criticisms people will choose to make toward that statement. But I will say this: Jesus has kept the promise he made his disciples, that he would never leave them alone in the journey. I may have felt alone at times. But looking back, I see today that I was never alone.

LifeSiteNews: How do you now see Christian/Catholic teaching on homosexuality? Is it hateful, discriminatory? Is a Christian being a bigot when he says he loves the same-sex attracted person, but hates what he does when he acts on those desires?

Bailey: If by “discriminatory,” you mean, “to be selective in such a way that maintains the Christian integrity of our faith,” then yes, we are certainly “discriminatory.” In fact, I believe that we are called to be discriminatory in that way. But what we are not is hateful—and certainly not as the gay activists regularly accuse and imply to their own, and to the rest of the world, that we are hateful.

We live in a world today where avoiding offense is given a higher standard than the concept we have of love itself. But that is because we have lost our biblical understanding of love, and we mistakenly think that if we truly “love” people, then we will not risk offending them. And many well-meaning, “born again” Christians have adopted the world’s view of making this mistake within their human reasoning.

The gay activists know all of this, of course, and they play upon it well to further advance their movement. They demand “tolerance,” for example, but then they self-justify their own vehement intolerance of Christian beliefs and views by comparing our Christian beliefs to bigotry, and bringing lawsuits to force Christian business owners to support homosexual events in ways that blatantly violate their faith and beliefs within their Christian business ethics.

What Christians do is point to the truth of our broken and sinful human nature, not out of condemnation but because of the depth of Christ’s love within us. Christians can look to Jesus for an example. Was Jesus suddenly being unloving toward the woman caught in the sin of adultery, for example, when he plainly told her, “go now, and sin no more” (John 8:11)? The truth will not always be pleasant to hear or to stomach. But that does not make us bigots for pointing out the obvious.

People need to better understand what biblical “love” actually is. And, as Christians, we need to also offer the solution. We can’t just say, “Homosexuality is a sin,” and then leave it at that. To be honest, I believe that every homosexual already inwardly knows that what they are doing is inherently contradictory to “who” God created them to be. But they need to be reminded of that fact along with the genuine hope that Christ also offers to each one of us, as we turn to him to overcome all of our human weakness and brokenness, not just the homosexual brokenness.

LifeSiteNews: What is the one thing faithful Christians need to keep in mind when dealing with the issue of homosexuality?

Bailey: Christians need to know that this is by no means an uncomplicated issue. But that is no reason to fear engaging it purposefully and directly either. This idea of “live and let live” is not how Christ was in the business of loving people. He engaged them directly, and he never avoided talking about the real “issues” that were involved.

For those people like myself who see the clear distinction between what we were doing, and “who” we are or desire to be, there is a very present guilt and fear of rejection when turning to ask people in the Christian community to help us — to help us to understand our own brokenness and sin in a biblical way that leaves a person feeling loved by Christ, rather than condemned by his followers.

Christians should do this by realizing that homosexuality is just another human brokenness, just like our own individual brokenness in so many ways. There should not be this stigma where some “sins” are acceptable to talk about openly and deal with, while things like homosexuality are not. The Body of Christ should be a place of healing for issues like homosexuality, not a place of fear.

LifeSiteNews: Why do so many people — especially those engaged in the gay lifestyle and those representing left-leaning media — loathe to hear about people like yourself who have left same-sex attraction behind? Do they fear something about your experience? What?

Bailey: What they fear about people like me is that our existence and credibility only destroys the very foundation of their own beliefs about themselves, and the reasons behind their own immoral behaviors.

LifeSiteNews: What do you think is really at the heart of the push for homosexual “marriage.” Who is behind this push? Is it really same-sex attracted persons fighting for ‘equality’ or do you think this group is being used by someone else for some other purpose?

Bailey: It is clear to me that a seeming majority of homosexuals actually do believe and adhere to a personal inward ideology that they are fighting for some sort of distorted “equality.” Albeit, their idea of equality could more accurately be described as homo-fascism, because of the way it has become an agenda of forced acceptance and inclusion within our society.

Spiritually speaking, however, I believe that Satan is the ultimate deceptive force and mastermind behind not just the marriage aspect of their agenda, but also behind the entire distortion that somehow managed to turn a dysfunctional human sexual behavior into a “civil rights” cause.

This article was originally published on the LifeSite News Website. I’ve taken the liberty to repost the same here to keep highlighting the fact that homosexuality is not a fixed or permanent identity. Restoration to normalcy is possible as this story illustrates – BLAKE.

Obama’s homosexual advocacy rebuffed by Kenya

July 26, 2015

Yesterday, President Barack Obama’s attempt to advocate for the legitimization of homosexual relationships on Kenyan soil came a cropper as his host President Uhuru Kenyatta diplomatically rebuffed him in the full glare of a watching world.

In his typical manner, Obama disingenuously framed the issue as one of human rights, comparing discrimination against homosexual practitioners with discrimination against black people in the United States, erroneously placing the two on the same level. As this blog has affirmed a number of times, nothing could be further from the truth.

Homosexual people identify themselves as gay because of their unnatural, perverted sexual behaviours that can be changed back to normalcy. And many have done so. Black people’s beautiful skin colour on the other hand is a genetic, immutable condition that has nothing to do with behaviour. My children were born black, not because of anything they did, but because their parents are both black.

For a comprehensive rebuttal of this homosexual disinformation strategy that insultingly places their perversion on the same level as racial identity, please check out an earlier post: Obama’s degradation of Black people: Comparing homosexuality with racial identity

Sodom – The movie that sharply exposes the west’s homosexual perversions

December 7, 2014

Here’s a most fascinating documentary that sharply exposes the moral rot and same-sex perversions being celebrated in western nations today. Just one more arsenal for Kenyans in their continued rejection of all things homosexual in our country.

Let Obama take his gay agenda elsewhere

July 6, 2013
Two black men in the USA getting "married". Nothing could delight President Obama more than seeing these kinds of bizarre "weddings" take place across the world, especially in Africa.

Two black men in the USA getting “married”. Nothing else could make US President Obama more happier than seeing these kinds of bizarre “weddings” take place across the world, especially in his fatherland Africa.

I was absolutely delighted to read a riveting article in yesterday’s Daily Nation going by the same title from Editor Dorothy Kweyu, eloquently rejecting Obama’s obnoxious push for so-called homosexual “rights” during his recent African tour of Senegal, South Africa and Tanzania. Obama’s gay advocacy-in-chief role was boosted by the recent shameful capitulation of the United States Supreme Court to the homosexual agenda. The court threw out the 1996 Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA) on the 26th June, 2013 and subsequently endorsed same-sex marriages across America, to Obama’s delight.

I was gratified to note that African leaders led by Senegal’s President Macky Sall were quick to reject and trash Obama’s absurd campaign for the celebration of sexual perversions in Africa. However, there was a loud silence from South Africa, the only country in Africa whose parliament (against majority voters wishes) introduced same-sex marriages in 2006. But I digress.

I’ve not hesitated in the past to blast the Nation Media Group (NMG) for their underhand campaigns for the normalisation of homosexuality in Kenya, but I have to admit that Kweyu’s article has strongly challenged this notion. It now seems that NMG has not officially adopted a supportive media policy for the legitimisation of homosexual causes as their liberal western counterparts have done. But I could be wrong.

In the meantime, the homosexual death-style advocacy role at the NMG can safely be said to be championed by a few writers such as Makau Mutua (State University of New York Law Professor), Muthoni Wanyeki (Kenya Human Rights Commission) and Sunday Nation columnist Dr. Lukoye Atwoli.

I now take the liberty of reproducing in full Kweyu’s wonderful and courageous article.

===========================================

Someone tell US President Barack Obama that the continent has more pressing issues to tackle than his fixation with gay and lesbian rights.

Someone also tell the same to human rights activist Ken Wafula who jumped to Mr Obama’s defence when Jubilee lawmakers criticised his pro-gay stance.

At a time when we are under siege from ongoing and planned labour strikes arising from campaign errors of a bygone era, the least President Obama should have done — even from the safety of Tanzanian borders — is to advise the powers-that-be to handle the teachers’ strike issue with the wisdom and the urgency it deserves.

Our children — and grandchildren — deserve to be in school, and the ongoing strike can only be detrimental to their overall welfare.

That is why I find it in extremely bad taste for Mr Obama to attempt to divert our attention to a personal lifestyle issue when more weighty issues are facing Kenya — simply the most unequal society in my view.

But that is for another day. For now, let me take the gay and lesbian bull by the horns

Like most politicians, President Obama knows which side his bread is buttered upon, and having been overwhelmingly voted back into office by minorities, including immigrants, gays and lesbians, he has no option but to sing their tune.

That is loyalty, and it is in order, as long as he does not make it a gospel to be preached to the rest of humanity.

The truth about the gay and lesbian ethos is that is it an anarchic lifestyle that goes against our basic humanity.

Notwithstanding advances in biotechnology, whereby we are being told that we are headed for a brave new world in which it will be possible to create human beings through cloning, it is a biological fact that only heterosexual unions can sustain life as we know it.

The union of the sperm and the ovum in heterosexual congress is the basis of society, and giving homosexuality free rein is akin to kissing goodbye to humanity.

I hear gays and lesbians yelling back at me that they should be allowed to adopt and raise children like any other citizens.

They have argued, ad nauseam, that they are genetically wired to homosexuality when clinical psychologists have proved beyond doubt that the homosexual and lesbian lifestyle is learned behaviour that has absolutely nothing to do with our genetic make-up.

In Kenya, the Constitution protects individuals against all forms of discrimination including on the basis of sexual orientation. But the same law only recognises marriage as a union of two consenting adults, male and female.

Whereas gays and lesbians are entitled to their inherent dignity as human beings, this should never be construed to mean that they have a cause to convert the world to a cul-de-sac lifestyle that negates the fundamentals of human survival.

The US Government’s massive funding of gays and lesbians is an affront to African culture, which, notwithstanding the nihilistic modernistic tendencies that are tearing it apart, is essentially pro-life and pro-family.

Let President Obama keep his gay agenda within the US as we have enough pressing issues to deal with.

You can read the original article here.

Obama’s degradation of Black people: Comparing homosexuality with racial identity

January 12, 2013

“My sexual act did not make me Black. This is something the gays cannot say, for it is a fact that their sexual act is why they call themselves gay.” – Wayne Perryman, 2008.

Kevin-Prince Boateng left the field with his AC Milan teammates after hearing racist abuse from opposing fans. An exhibition soccer game between AC Milan and lower division club Pro Patria was abandoned last Thursday 3rd January, 2013 after Milan's players walked off the pitch because of racist chants, the latest incident of racial abuse blighting the sport in Europe. (Antonio Calanni/AP file photo).

Thursday 3rd January, 2013: AC Milan’s soccer player Kevin-Prince Boateng is the latest high profile victim of racial hatred. He walked off the field with his AC Milan teammates after racist abuse from opposing fans, abandoning an exhibition soccer match against lower division club Pro Patria. President Obama would want everyone to believe that Boateng’s racial identity is equal to homosexual behaviour. (Antonio Calanni/AP file photo).

My first blog post this year focuses on the most insulting lie ever perpetrated by homosexual lobby groups across the world, the liberal media and politicians in the west, and particularly President Obama. This is the outrageous claim that engaging in homosexual activity is the same as being born black, and therefore rejecting homosexuality is a form of bigotry! This barefaced lie needs to be exposed for what it is, especially at a time when racial hatred is under media spotlight following recent racial epithets hurled at Ghanaian international football star Kevin-Prince Boateng.

Its important that fellow Kenyans are in a strong position to factually refute any attempts to package homosexuality as an immutable genetic attribute akin to racial identity or gender. Obama’s past falsehoods to that effect are much more toxic because he identifies himself as an African-American. Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick (also African-American) has continued to perpetuate this illegitimate comparison at every opportunity. His daughter Katherine is a lesbian.

The worst capitulation to political interests over 2012 was by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) while agreeing with Obama’s support for same-sex marriages. NAACP issued a statement comparing African-American struggles for racial equality with homosexual agitation for same-sex marriages. Nothing could be further from the truth, and may I add, more disgusting.

It’s really the worst insult anyone can come up with to compare the 1960s Black American civil rights movement with people who identify themselves with how they choose to have sex. Obama and his fellow gay journeymen in the US political establishment have over the last few years shamelessly attempted to re-define a perverted sexual behaviour into a minority status equal to racial identity. Sunday Nation columnist Makau Mutua has repeatedly used this obnoxious line of argument to promote homosexual behaviour as a legitimate “minority” status through his articles.

This disgraceful comparison is nothing more than the ultimate insult and degradation of all people of colour. There is simply no legitimate or rational comparison between skin color and any form of sexual behavior. I hereby present a simple table to illustrate the unbridgeable chasm between a so-called homosexual identity and our God-given racial identities.

Racial identity Homosexuality
1 Being born into any race is determined by the genetic racial identity of your parents. You did not behave in any way or contribute anything to be born white, black or brown. It is defined as “having a desire for someone of the same sex [gender] or the act of having sex with someone of the same sex [gender].” In other words it is a sexual behavior carried out with someone of the same gender.
2 Having a black, brown or white skin is a physical status. Homosexuality is a sexual behavior expressed and not a physical trait of any person.
3 You cannot live ‘in the closet’ to hide your racial identity from society. Most homosexuals can live comfortably ‘in the closet’ hiding their behavior from society for the rest of their lives.
4 Racial identity is immutable. You cannot change your racial identity no matter what you do. Many homosexuals across the world continue to renounce their former sexual perversions to lead normal, healthy and heterosexual lifestyles.
5 Racial identity has no bearing on your moral decisions. That is, your ability to make distinctions between right and wrong in your daily conduct. Homosexual behavior is a wrong sexual behavior (immoral) because it is biologically unhealthy, biologically unnatural and it violates God’s established moral order on the sexual conduct of men and women.
6 Racial identity has no bearing on your physical or mental health. Homosexual behavior carries with it severe risks of being afflicted with a range of diseases such as HIV/AIDS, anal cancer, Kaporsis Sarcoma and mental disorders leading to disproportionately higher suicide rates and overall shortened life spans. That’s why it’s known as the homosexual ‘deathstyle’.

This universal distinction needs to be made patently clear to any one who would dare utter the asinine statement – “being gay is like being black”. This is especially critical at a time when homosexual organizations and their financiers from the West are engaged in heightened activity for the promotion of homosexual behaviour in Kenya. This can be seen through the staging of a “Kenya Gay and Lesbians Awards Day” on December 15th, 2012 organised by the NGO Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC).

This was followed by a media revelation that the Kenya Institute of Education had stealthily introduced a homosexual inspired set book for Kenyan high school students – The Whale Rider – all the way from New Zealand! Fellow Kenyans, lets stand up against these wicked attempts to legitimize an evidently depraved and dangerous lifestyle to our youths.

For detailed and very useful information on how children develop into homosexuals, click on this link.

The Global Threat of Homosexuality

August 15, 2012

By Dr Scott Lively

This is possibly the most enlightening speech you will hear on this subject. So powerful that it was banned by YouTube!

Over the span of just fifty years the homosexual political movement has transformed itself from an underground subculture shunned for its practice of illegal sexual deviance into a global cultural and political force with greater influence in the legislatures and courtrooms of the Western world than the Christian church.

Pastor Lively examines the astonishing rise of homosexuality as a global phenomenon, its history, and strategy and the alarming extent to which the movement steers culture and controls key institutions, both in America and around the world. He also ties in the centrality of homosexuality to end-times apostasy. This teaching will provide you with valuable insight on the most important moral issue of our time.

Earlier this year, YouTube suddenly banned the video from its site, claiming it represented “hate speech.” Not really a big surprise considering that YouTube is owned by Google, which marches in “Gay Pride” parades around America. Just another example of Google’s “tolerance” for free speech!

Watch the full video speech here courtesy of MassResistance.

President Obama destroys America’s military might using Homosexuality

December 22, 2010

United States President Barrack Obama’s misguided dream of imposing homosexuality on Americans received a tremendous boost last Saturday 18th December 2010 when the Democrat-controlled US House and Senate voted 63-33, allowing likely passage of a bill to repeal the ban on open homosexuals in the military.

Taking advantage of the “lame-duck” session before newly elected Republican Party members are sworn in early next year, Democrats led by Majority Leader Harry Reid and supported by several “conservatives” such us Sen. Joseph Lieberman (Independent) secured the vote to effectively homosexualize the United States Armed Forces.

Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality, which opposes the “gay” activist agenda, said the vote, potentially clearing the way for repealing the military ban, is the most important homosexuality-related congressional vote ever held: “If the lame-duck Congress succeeds in ‘gaying down’ our military this weekend, it will take a disastrous leap toward “mainstreaming” deviant, sinful homosexual conduct – not just in the military but in larger society — thus further propelling America’s moral downward spiral.”

Obama has frequently and falsely compared homosexuality, a changeable, destructive and depraved sexual BEHAVIOUR, to the question of RACE, an immutable genetic characteristic that is not destructive or deviant in any way. He has often gone ahead to claim that the homosexual “rights” movement is similar to the Black Civil Rights movement of the 1960s. I maintain that this is a gross insult to all black people in the world.

With these unfortunate developments in the US military, I foresee the rapid weakening of its might as professional and morally-inclined soldiers leave in droves to avoid being compelled to shower and bunk with fellows ogling their backsides. Morale and discipline is also likely to go down with the emergence of an effeminate “pink” culture in the US barracks [see the videos below].

As I conclude this commentary, its important to note that one of the reasons cited in historical studies for the decline and eventual collapse of the once mighty Roman empire was the embrace and celebration of homosexuality. Thanks to Obama and his radical liberal agenda, the United States of America is now ready to follow suit.

The new Kenyan Constitution and Homosexuality

August 8, 2010

Following the clear endorsement by Kenyans of a new constitution on August 4th 2010, there has been lots of talk in some homo quarters regarding certain clauses on the Bill of Rights that are believed to somehow decriminalise homosexuality in Kenya. I’ve checked out these allegations and found them to be spurious and not to be taken seriously.

To all the homo lobbies in Nairobi and their elitist Western-educated supporters such as Muthoni Wanyeki (Kenya Human Rights Commission and a regular columnist of the East African newspaper) and her comrade-in-arms Prof Makau Mutua (Sunday Nation columnist) – as we say here in Kenya – poleni sana!

The penal code is very much in place and the new constitution does not contradict nor eradicate Section 162 to 165. This still criminalises homosexual behaviour and attempted homosexual behaviour between men, referring to it as “carnal knowledge against the order of nature”. The penalty remains 5 to 14 years imprisonment.

Going by the strong negative reactions from Kenyans during the referendum campaigns whenever the bogey of same-sex marriage was brought up by the “NO” leaders, I’m confident that homosexuality will never be legalised in Kenya. Let this diseased condition remain in the West, to be celebrated by the likes of President Obama who are so convinced it is a healthy lifestyle for their Nations.

I would now like to share an excellent article below that was published in the Standard Newspaper early this year. Due to its very hilarious yet sharp, no-apologies-take-no-prisoners approach to the destructive homosexual lifestyle, I found it prudent and timely to post the same here as a matter of public record for anyone interested in establishing how the average normal Kenyan man actually views homosexuality. Hats off to the writer.

==========================================

Homosexuality perversion is a threat to survival of humankind

Barrack Muluka
Published on 09/01/2010

Homosexuals have coined the word homophobia, to mean intense fear or hatred of homosexuals or homosexuality. Accordingly, I am classified as homophobic. This is on account of the fact I cannot stand homosexuals.

I can pity them, yes. But stand them, no. I have never stood them. And I know of one or two homos; and I have also heard it rumoured around that some well known public figures have these contemptible appetites.

You will occasionally come across uncouth male characters who will even try to finger you in conversation and try ‘taking you out’. When they do not try this, they disgustingly try to be coy and womanish with you. The very thought of it makes me sick.

Let me have about me a couple of dozens of Tiger Woods and their dozens of concubines. I can live with that and so, too, can Mother Nature and a whole world out there, when all the virtuous hypocrisy about Tiger and his one dozen mistresses is set aside. But homosexuality is another ballgame altogether. While the practice itself should be shameful in the extreme, it is worse than scandalous that society allows homosexuals to brazenly talk about such psychotic and psychopathic things as ‘same sex marriage’, ‘gay rights’ and ‘gay tolerance’.

I had never even considered that I should some day demean my pen to write about the perversion that is men scrambling for men. For I have always considered the homosexual a pervert, who should be left alone. And I have left these nauseous fellows alone.

But this is to the extent that they leave you alone. Today, homos whom we thought were normal men and whom, therefore, we respected are obliquely (and sometimes quite overtly) pronouncing their status and trying to make society feel guilty about its aversion to homosexuality.

Mother Nature in her own wisdom devised her preservation through the dual faculties of procreation and recreation. In order to procreate, nature laced the path of creating life with a huge dose of giving and receiving pleasure.

But the exchange was between a man and a woman. For the pleasure is not an end in itself. It is a bonus to those who do the good job of making life.

Man and Woman are naturally designed to enjoy the sex act with the goal of producing offspring. Nature was aware that if the element of pleasure should be lacking, then Man and Woman may be disinclined to coming together merely for continuity of life. And so they serenade as they mould and they mould as they serenade.

Homosexuality is a threat to the very survival of humankind. For in this distorted engagement, ‘serenading’ is the end in itself. Homosexual ‘couples’ argue that they can come round the procreation concern through adoption of children or some laboratory abracadabra. The bottom line is the same. To perpetuate life, you need the combined male and female effort. Homosexuality is hostile to this effort.

But people claiming superior scientific knowledge argue that homos have a ‘different natural inclination’. They say that we should understand this and be tolerant. But pray, where does this ‘understanding’ and ‘tolerance’ stop? The next thing is that paedophiles will be telling us to ‘understand’ and ‘tolerate’ their appetite for children, including infants. For if it is natural for some people to be inclined towards the same sex, we must ‘naturally’ understand that some other people will be ‘naturally’ inclined towards babies.

I have seen in the streets of Amsterdam picture posters that invite the public to live sex shows in the sex houses of the Dutch city. On some of the posters are promotional photographs of pedigree European dogs — real German shepherd dogs and sundry hounds and mongrels — fully set in nauseating phallic readiness to perform on a human female. Then there are jet set ‘virile men’ ready for congress with she-mongrels.

Now if it is natural for some people to be inclined towards congress with members of the same sex, we must also concede space to those drawn to copulation with mongrels and sundry fauna.

Then there is the rapist. If the homosexual must have his space, let the rapist have his space, too.The lowest common factor between the rapist, the paedophiliac and the dog-man is that they have evolved perverted carnal appetites that run counter to the law of nature.

If one should have ‘his rights’, then let all have their rights. The difference between two consenting males on the one hand and a consenting human and a dog on the other hand is academic. Soon, too, the notion of a consenting infant will be irrelevant.

They ask you, ‘suppose your son was a homosexual, what would you do?’ Now this is what philosophers call a reductio ad absurdum. Suppose your son was a dog-man? Of course he cannot be my son if he is a homosexual, or a dog-man. He could be my anything else, but not a son. He cannot be anybody’s son. Sons don’t marry other men, nor do they allow other men to marry them.

No, he cannot be a son. Sons can only be men with the proclivity to pass the genes they inherited from their forefathers to subsequent generations of their family trees, through the only path that nature has opened for this purpose.

The writer is a publishing editor and media consultant.

[Click for original article]

Diseases Associated With Homosexuality

May 18, 2009

Almost a year ago, on Sunday 8th June 2008 to be precise, I commenced a 3-part series of Posts focused on Diseases that are often and increasingly associated with Homosexual behaviour. The responses were overwhelming, especially from homosexuals who got deeply offended by the Truth regarding their dangerous lifestyle. Since Google (an increasingly pro-homosexual organisation) will not let bloggers such as myself debate openly against the Western Homosexual culture, I hereby share Part 1 of the Posts as a public record for fellow Kenyans. 

Part 1: HIV/AIDS
As we continue to demolish the flimsy foundations on which faggots base their claims to normality, today I commence a new chapter in which we’ll examine the severe threat homosexual behavior poses to both personal and public health. 

Over the last two decades, medical findings have strongly established that homosexual behaviour does indeed carry fundamental health risks not only to its practitioners, but also to the general public. In the United States of America for example, medical data has identified homosexual activity among males as by far, the largest single source of HIV infection in the general population.

In a dramatic admission early this year, homosexual activist Matt Foreman, executive director of the United States National Gay and Lesbian Task Force shocked fellow faggots by declaring, “HIV is a gay disease.”

While addressing the National Conference on Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender Equality in Detroit, Michigan, Foremen stunned the assembled faggots by stating, “with 70 percent of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi-sexual, we cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that.” The conference had the theme ”Creating Change”. 
 

Matt Foreman, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force executive director who admitted, “HIV is a gay disease.”

Matt Foreman, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force executive director who admitted, “HIV is a gay disease.”

For many years, homosexual activists in the West have strongly and typically fought back whenever medical findings showed their lifestyle to be associated with the AIDS pandemic. The startling admission by one of their most prominent leaders in early February 2008 to this effect has left homosexual activists in a serious predicament.

Following this admission, gay activists will find it very difficult to promote and defend their behaviour in Kenya. As I will illustrate here, homosexuality is not only medically associated with life threatening diseases such as AIDS, but also with certain types of mental illness, substance abuse, eating disorders, cancer, hepatitis and premature death by up to twenty years.

Before I delve into these diseases, it’s important to note here that a United States Government agency, the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) has since 1992 maintained a policy of rejecting blood donated by Men who have had Sex with other Men (MSM), at any time since 1977 (the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in the United States). 

This is because MSM are as a group, at increased risk of HIV, Hepatitis B and certain other infections that can be transmitted by transfusion. According to the American Red Cross, MSM since 1977 have an HIV prevalence (the total number of cases of a disease that are present in a population at a specific point in time) 60 times higher than the general population, 800 times higher than first time straight blood donors and 8000 times higher than repeat blood donors. 

In addition, HIV surveillance data collected by the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through June 2000 suggests that nearly half of all HIV-positive teenage males are infected through sex with men. Through 2004, of all cases of HIV infection in the United States reported to CDC, 34% were attributed to male-male sexual contact, 14% to injection-drug use, and 20% to heterosexual contact. 

Through blood donor testing, homosexuals account for the largest single group of blood donors who have been found HIV positive. (Source – CDC website).

The FDA policy is not unique to the United States. Many European countries have recently re-examined both the science and ethics of the lifetime MSM deferral, and have retained it. Lifetime MSM deferral simply means that a man who has ever had sex with another man will never be accepted as a blood donor. This decision is also consistent with the prevailing interpretation of the European Union Directive 2004/33/EC article 2.1 on donor deferrals.

For more reasons on why this policy has remained in place despite the presence of many influential homosexual organisations in the USA, visit the FDA website link.

Here in Kenya, the prevalence of HIV/AIDS among Homosexuals is not any different from the sorry figures shared above. The General Manager of the Kenyan faggot website www.galck.org is on record admitting the same. He notes that “the few studies done on MSM activity in the country point at very grave seroprevalence levels among the MSM, typically a group that would also include gay men in Kenya. The Kilifi study points at 43%.” 

He candidly goes further to share: “Latest data from National Aids Control Council points out that 15% of all new HIV infections in the country are MSM related. For a population that is typically very small (perhaps less than 5%), these figures should be worrisome.”

With so many facts available in the public domain detailing the health dangers associated with homosexual behaviour, it would certainly be the height of foolishness and utmost recklessness for the Kenyan Government to EVER consider decriminalizing homosexuality in our country. 

Part 2: Anal Cancer

To be continued next post….